COLLEGE FOOTBALL STATISTICS
2014
American Athletic Conference
RUSHING G Att Yards Avg TD Long Avg/G
1. MACK, Marlon-USF 12 202 1041 5.2 9 75 86.8
2. HAYES, Brandon-MEM 11 173 902 5.2 5 51 82.0
3. LANGER, Zack-TLS 10 196 801 4.1 4 34 80.1
4. FARROW, Kenneth-HOU 12 164 934 5.7 12 58 77.8
5. STANBACK, William-UCF 9 177 659 3.7 10 41 73.2
6. ALLEN, Breon-ECU 12 134 869 6.5 8 84 72.4
7. DAVIS,Matt-SMU 10 108 613 5.7 4 51 61.3
8. BADIE, Sherman-TLN 12 121 688 5.7 3 90 57.3
9. JACKSON, Ryan-HOU 12 110 597 5.4 5 56 49.8
10. MOORE, Rod-CIN 12 134 596 4.4 5 61 49.7
PASS EFFICIENCY G Comp Att Int Pct Yards TD Long Effic
1. KIEL, Gunner-CIN 12 219 364 11 60.2 3010 30 83 150.8
2. CARDEN, Shane-ECU 12 358 551 8 65.0 4309 28 55 144.5
3. LYNCH, Paxton-MEM 12 235 367 6 64.0 2725 18 54 139.3
4. HOLMAN, Justin-UCF 12 200 339 13 59.0 2661 20 77 136.7
5. WARD Jr., Greg-HOU 12 160 237 7 67.5 1645 9 89 132.4
6. WHITMER, Chandler-UCONN 12 124 223 8 55.6 1522 11 88 122.0
7. EVANS, Dane-TLS 12 256 462 17 55.4 3102 23 84 120.9
8. WHITE, Mike-USF 11 122 242 7 50.4 1639 8 85 112.4
9. WALKER,P.J.-TEM 12 203 381 15 53.3 2317 13 75 107.8
10. LEE, Tanner-TLN 10 185 336 14 55.1 1962 12 74 107.6
RECEPTIONS/GAME G Rec Yards TD Long Avg/C Avg/G Rec/G
1. HARDY, Justin-ECU 12 110 1334 9 38 12.1 111.2 9.2
2. LUCAS, Keevan-TLS 12 101 1219 11 84 12.1 101.6 8.4
3. JONES, Isaiah-ECU 12 75 766 5 41 10.2 63.8 6.2
4. GREENBERRY, D.-HOU 12 68 756 4 67 11.1 63.0 5.7
5. WASHINGTON, S.-CIN 12 61 661 4 34 10.8 55.1 5.1
6. JOSEPH,Darius-SMU 11 54 379 2 25 7.0 34.5 4.9
7. WORTHY, Cam-ECU 10 47 886 3 53 18.9 88.6 4.7
GARRETT, Keyarris-TLS 10 47 698 5 39 14.9 69.8 4.7
9. HALL, Rannell-UCF 9 42 422 0 23 10.0 46.9 4.7
10. FITZPATRICK, Jalen-TEM 12 53 730 6 75 13.8 60.8 4.4
RECEIVE YDS/GAME G Rec Yards TD Long Rec/G Avg/C Avg/G
1. HARDY, Justin-ECU 12 110 1334 9 38 9.2 12.1 111.2
2. LUCAS, Keevan-TLS 12 101 1219 11 84 8.4 12.1 101.6
3. WORTHY, Cam-ECU 10 47 886 3 53 4.7 18.9 88.6
4. PERRIMAN, Breshad-UCF 12 41 906 9 61 3.4 22.1 75.5
5. GARRETT, Keyarris-TLS 10 47 698 5 39 4.7 14.9 69.8
6. JONES, Isaiah-ECU 12 75 766 5 41 6.2 10.2 63.8
7. GREENBERRY, D.-HOU 12 68 756 4 67 5.7 11.1 63.0
8. FITZPATRICK, Jalen-TEM 12 53 730 6 75 4.4 13.8 60.8
9. MCKAY, Mekale-CIN 12 42 690 8 80 3.5 16.4 57.5
10. WASHINGTON, S.-CIN 12 61 661 4 34 5.1 10.8 55.1
PUNT RETURN AVG G No Yards TD Long Avg
1. MALONE, Keiwone-MEM 12 30 242 0 24 8.1
KICK RETURN AVG G No Yards TD Long Avg
1. DUNKLEY, Chris-USF 11 23 553 0 41 24.0
2. BREWER, D'Angelo-TLS 12 27 602 0 58 22.3
3. HOLTON, Johnny-CIN 12 31 640 0 40 20.6
4. SANDERS,Deion-SMU 9 37 759 0 64 20.5
5. NEWSOME, Arkeel-UCONN 12 36 730 0 47 20.3
6. AYERS, Demarcus-HOU 12 30 542 0 43 18.1
ALL PURPOSE G Rush Rcv PR KR Yards Yards/G
1. HARDY, Justin-ECU 12 7 1334 77 0 1418 118.2
2. LUCAS, Keevan-TLS 12 66 1219 0 0 1285 107.1
3. SANDERS,Deion-SMU 9 0 188 0 759 947 105.2
4. JONES, Isaiah-ECU 12 0 766 8 459 1233 102.8
5. ALLEN, Breon-ECU 12 869 289 0 55 1213 101.1
6. MACK, Marlon-USF 12 1041 160 0 0 1201 100.1
7. HALL, Rannell-UCF 9 127 422 0 330 879 97.7
8. HAYES, Brandon-MEM 11 902 84 0 10 996 90.5
9. THOMAS,Jahad-TEM 12 384 364 0 332 1080 90.0
10. NEWSOME, Arkeel-UCONN 12 188 155 0 730 1073 89.4
SCORING OFFENSE G TD FG XPT 2XP DXP Saf Points Avg/G
1. East Carolina 12 59 12 56 0 0 0 446 37.2
2. Cincinnati 12 55 15 50 0 0 0 425 35.4
3. Memphis 12 51 19 51 0 0 1 416 34.7
4. Houston 12 44 16 40 0 0 0 352 29.3
5. UCF 12 40 19 37 1 0 1 338 28.2
6. Tulsa 12 37 12 34 2 0 0 296 24.7
7. Temple 12 33 15 32 0 0 1 277 23.1
8. USF 12 24 13 23 0 0 0 206 17.2
9. Tulane 12 24 8 22 0 0 1 192 16.0
10. UConn 12 23 9 19 1 0 0 186 15.5
11. SMU 12 15 9 12 1 0 1 133 11.1
SCORING DEFENSE G TD FG XPT 2XP DXP Saf Points Avg/G
1. Memphis 12 26 8 23 1 0 0 205 17.1
2. Temple 12 24 14 24 0 0 0 210 17.5
3. UCF 12 25 14 23 0 0 0 215 17.9
4. Houston 12 29 9 29 0 0 2 234 19.5
5. East Carolina 12 37 17 33 1 0 0 308 25.7
6. Cincinnati 12 39 16 37 0 0 1 321 26.8
7. USF 12 41 12 40 0 0 1 324 27.0
8. Tulane 12 41 17 40 1 0 1 341 28.4
9. UConn 12 45 13 43 1 0 2 358 29.8
10. Tulsa 12 62 12 59 1 0 1 471 39.2
11. SMU 12 63 20 58 0 0 0 496 41.3
TOTAL OFFENSE G Rush Pass Plays Yards Avg/P TD Avg/G
1. East Carolina 12 1985 4408 969 6393 6.6 57 532.8
2. Cincinnati 12 1891 3602 875 5493 6.3 51 457.8
3. Memphis 12 2302 2770 915 5072 5.5 47 422.7
4. Tulsa 12 1774 3176 958 4950 5.2 34 412.5
5. Houston 12 2175 2628 876 4803 5.5 41 400.2
6. UCF 12 1586 2768 861 4354 5.1 39 362.8
7. Tulane 12 1742 2388 866 4130 4.8 24 344.2
8. Temple 12 1293 2408 772 3701 4.8 24 308.4
9. USF 12 1295 2361 740 3656 4.9 22 304.7
10. UConn 12 1289 2032 737 3321 4.5 20 276.8
11. SMU 12 1204 2024 792 3228 4.1 15 269.0
TOTAL DEFENSE G Rush Pass Plays Yards Avg/P TD Avg/G
1. UCF 12 1169 2225 792 3394 4.3 23 282.8
2. Houston 12 1632 2352 842 3984 4.7 29 332.0
3. Memphis 12 1503 2616 868 4119 4.7 25 343.2
4. Temple 12 1922 2243 876 4165 4.8 21 347.1
5. East Carolina 12 1285 3151 866 4436 5.1 33 369.7
6. UConn 12 2036 2505 870 4541 5.2 39 378.4
7. Tulane 12 1891 2668 820 4559 5.6 34 379.9
8. USF 12 2195 2638 849 4833 5.7 38 402.8
9. Cincinnati 12 2178 3196 886 5374 6.1 38 447.8
10. Tulsa 12 2576 3265 841 5841 6.9 59 486.8
11. SMU 12 2829 3164 905 5993 6.6 59 499.4
RUSHING OFFENSE G Att Yards Avg TD Yards/G
1. Memphis 12 543 2302 4.2 28 191.8
2. Houston 12 454 2175 4.8 26 181.2
3. East Carolina 12 400 1985 5.0 28 165.4
4. Cincinnati 12 421 1891 4.5 18 157.6
5. Tulsa 12 477 1774 3.7 11 147.8
6. Tulane 12 420 1742 4.1 11 145.2
7. UCF 12 498 1586 3.2 19 132.2
8. USF 12 376 1295 3.4 11 107.9
9. Temple 12 369 1293 3.5 11 107.8
10. UConn 12 397 1289 3.2 8 107.4
11. SMU 12 362 1204 3.3 9 100.3
RUSHING DEFENSE G Att Yards Avg TD Yards/G
1. UCF 12 379 1169 3.1 8 97.4
2. East Carolina 12 394 1285 3.3 15 107.1
3. Memphis 12 423 1503 3.6 14 125.2
4. Houston 12 463 1632 3.5 15 136.0
5. Tulane 12 446 1891 4.2 16 157.6
6. Temple 12 509 1922 3.8 12 160.2
7. UConn 12 481 2036 4.2 18 169.7
8. Cincinnati 12 457 2178 4.8 17 181.5
9. USF 12 487 2195 4.5 22 182.9
10. Tulsa 12 467 2576 5.5 30 214.7
11. SMU 12 541 2829 5.2 32 235.8
PASS OFFENSE G Comp Att Int Pct Yards Avg TD Avg/G
1. East Carolina 12 368 569 9 64.7 4408 7.7 29 367.3
2. Cincinnati 12 276 454 12 60.8 3602 7.9 33 300.2
3. Tulsa 12 263 481 18 54.7 3176 6.6 23 264.7
4. Memphis 12 238 372 6 64.0 2770 7.4 19 230.8
5. UCF 12 210 363 14 57.9 2768 7.6 20 230.7
6. Houston 12 255 422 15 60.4 2628 6.2 15 219.0
7. Temple 12 214 403 16 53.1 2408 6.0 13 200.7
8. Tulane 12 242 446 18 54.3 2388 5.4 13 199.0
9. USF 12 179 364 11 49.2 2361 6.5 11 196.8
10. UConn 12 185 340 12 54.4 2032 6.0 12 169.3
11. SMU 12 230 430 14 53.5 2024 4.7 6 168.7
PASS DEFENSE G Comp Att Int Pct Yards Avg TD Avg/G
1. UCF 12 226 413 18 54.7 2225 5.4 15 185.4
2. Temple 12 216 367 11 58.9 2243 6.1 9 186.9
3. Houston 12 214 379 19 56.5 2352 6.2 14 196.0
4. UConn 12 229 389 8 58.9 2505 6.4 21 208.8
5. Memphis 12 241 445 14 54.2 2616 5.9 11 218.0
6. USF 12 249 362 6 68.8 2638 7.3 16 219.8
7. Tulane 12 218 374 17 58.3 2668 7.1 18 222.3
8. East Carolina 12 271 472 13 57.4 3151 6.7 18 262.6
9. SMU 12 230 364 6 63.2 3164 8.7 27 263.7
10. Cincinnati 12 261 429 7 60.8 3196 7.4 21 266.3
11. Tulsa 12 232 374 8 62.0 3265 8.7 29 272.1