COLLEGE FOOTBALL STATISTICS
2012
Southeastern Conference ALL-PURPOSE RUNNING Rank Player Gm Net Rec PR Kor Yards Yds/gm 1. Cordarrelle Patterson, Tennessee 12 308 778 101 671 1858 154.83 2. Ladarius Perkins, Mississippi St. 12 1024 160 0 325 1509 125.75 3. Todd Gurley, Georgia 14 1385 117 0 243 1745 124.64 4. Jordan Matthews, Vanderbilt 13 61 132 53 32 1469 113.00 5. Cobi Hamilton, Arkansas 12 0 133 0 0 1335 111.25 6. Johnny Manziel, Texas A&M 13 1410 0 0 0 1410 108.46 7. Eddie Lacy, Alabama 14 1322 189 0 0 1511 107.93 8. Zac Stacy, Vanderbilt 13 1141 205 15 0 1361 104.69 9. Dennis Johnson, Arkansas 12 757 160 0 309 1226 102.17 10. Onterio McCalebb, Auburn 12 570 132 0 523 1225 102.08 FIELD GOALS Rank Player Gm Fga Fgm Avg FgPgm 1. Caleb Sturgis, Florida 13 28 24 .857 1.85 2. Drew Alleman, LSU 13 29 21 .724 1.62 3. Carey Spear, Vanderbilt 13 24 20 .833 1.54 4. Bryson Rose, Ole Miss 13 28 18 .643 1.38 5. Andrew Baggett, Missouri 12 20 14 .700 1.17 6. Devon Bell, Mississippi St. 13 21 14 .667 1.08 7. Taylor Bertolet, Texas A&M 13 22 13 .591 1.00 8. Zach Hocker, Arkansas 12 18 11 .611 .92 8. Cody Parkey, Auburn 12 14 11 .786 .92 10. Adam Yates, South Carolina 13 17 11 .647 .85 INTERCEPTIONS Rank Player Gm Int Yds TD IntPgm 1. Byron Moore, Tennessee 12 5 88 1 .42 2. Darius Slay, Mississippi St. 13 5 101 1 .38 3. Haha Clinton-Dix, Alabama 14 5 91 0 .36 4. Matt Elam, Florida 13 4 73 0 .31 4. Johnthan Banks, Mississippi St. 13 4 124 0 .31 4. Tharold Simon, LSU 13 4 43 0 .31 7. Robert Lester, Alabama 14 4 51 0 .29 7. Damian Swann, Georgia 14 4 61 0 .29 9. Dehendret Collins, Ole Miss 11 3 25 0 .27 10. Ross Rasner, Arkansas 12 3 34 0 .25 10. Craig Loston, LSU 12 3 103 1 .25 10. Sanders Commings, Georgia 12 3 0 0 .25 10. Senquez Golson, Ole Miss 12 3 55 0 .25 KICKOFF RETURN Rank Player Gm KRet Yds TD Avg RetGm 1. Cordarrelle Patterson, Tennessee 12 24 671 1 27.96 2.00 2. Michael Ford, LSU 13 20 549 0 27.45 1.54 3. Jameon Lewis, Mississippi St. 13 20 517 1 25.85 1.54 4. Jaylen Walton, Ole Miss 13 26 643 1 24.73 2.00 5. Marcus Murphy, Missouri 12 19 458 1 24.11 1.58 6. Onterio McCalebb, Auburn 12 23 523 1 22.74 1.92 7. Bruce Ellington, South Carolina 13 18 406 0 22.56 1.38 8. Malcolm Mitchell, Georgia 13 16 360 0 22.50 1.23 9. Trey Williams, Texas A&M 13 25 557 0 22.28 1.92 10. Brian Kimbrow, Vanderbilt 13 22 486 0 22.09 1.69 PASSING EFFICIENCY Rank Player Gm Att Cmp CPct Int PYds YdsAtt TD Rating 1. A.J. McCarron, Alabama 14 314 211 67.20 3 2933 9.34 30 175.28 2. Aaron Murray, Georgia 14 386 249 64.51 10 3893 10.09 36 174.82 3. Connor Shaw, South Carolina 11 228 154 67.54 7 1956 8.58 17 158.07 4. Johnny Manziel, Texas A&M 13 434 295 67.97 9 3706 8.54 26 155.32 5. Tyler Bray, Tennessee 12 451 268 59.42 12 3612 8.01 34 146.25 6. Tyler Wilson, Arkansas 11 401 249 62.09 13 3387 8.45 21 143.84 7. Dylan Thompson, South Carolina 11 127 66 51.97 2 1027 8.09 10 142.73 8. Bo Wallace, Ole Miss 13 368 235 63.86 17 2994 8.14 22 142.69 9. Jordan Rodgers, Vanderbilt 12 319 191 59.87 5 2539 7.96 15 139.11 10. Tyler Russell, Mississippi St. 13 394 231 58.63 10 2897 7.35 24 135.42 PUNTING Rank Player Gm Punt Yds Avg PuntGm 1. Kyle Christy, Florida 13 66 3023 45.80 5.08 2. Dylan Breeding, Arkansas 12 53 2416 45.58 4.42 3. Richard Kent, Vanderbilt 13 59 2652 44.95 4.54 4. Brad Wing, LSU 12 59 2643 44.80 4.92 5. Trey Barrow, Missouri 12 68 2925 43.01 5.67 6. Landon Foster, Kentucky 12 61 2617 42.90 5.08 7. Collin Barber, Georgia 14 60 2488 41.47 4.29 8. Jim Broadway, Ole Miss 13 57 2345 41.14 4.38 9. Baker Swedenburg, Mississippi St. 13 57 2340 41.05 4.38 10. Steven Clark, Auburn 12 70 2783 39.76 5.83 PUNT RETURN Rank Player Gm Ret Yds TD Avg RetGm 1. Ace Sanders, South Carolina 13 28 429 2 15.32 2.15 2. Marcus Murphy, Missouri 12 27 374 3 13.85 2.25 3. Dustin Harris, Texas A&M 13 34 432 1 12.71 2.62 4. Jonathan Krause, Vanderbilt 13 25 281 2 11.24 1.92 5. Christion Jones, Alabama 14 21 213 0 10.14 1.50 6. Devrin Young, Tennessee 10 16 155 0 9.69 1.60 7. Odell Beckham, Jr., LSU 13 35 320 2 9.14 2.69 8. Quan Bray, Auburn 11 16 136 0 8.50 1.45 9. Demarco Robinson, Kentucky 12 18 117 0 6.50 1.50 10. Nate Holmes, Arkansas 9 11 70 0 6.36 1.22 RECEPTIONS PER GAME Rank Player Gm Rec Yds TD RecGm YdsCat YdsGm 1. Cobi Hamilton, Arkansas 12 90 1335 5 7.50 14.83 111.25 2. Jordan Matthews, Vanderbilt 13 94 1323 8 7.23 14.07 101.77 3. Mike Evans, Texas A&M 13 82 1105 5 6.31 13.48 85.00 4. Justin Hunter, Tennessee 12 73 1083 9 6.08 14.84 90.25 5. Ryan Swope, Texas A&M 13 72 913 8 5.54 12.68 70.23 6. Donte Moncrief, Ole Miss 13 66 979 10 5.08 14.83 75.31 7. Chad Bumphis, Mississippi St. 13 58 922 12 4.46 15.90 70.92 8. Jarvis Landry, LSU 13 56 573 5 4.31 10.23 44.08 9. Amari Cooper, Alabama 14 59 1000 11 4.21 16.95 71.43 10. Emory Blake, Auburn 12 50 789 3 4.17 15.78 65.75 RECEIVING YARDS PER GAME Rank Player Gm Rec Yds TD RecGm YdsCat Yds/gm 1. Cobi Hamilton, Arkansas 12 90 1335 5 7.50 14.83 111.25 2. Jordan Matthews, Vanderbilt 13 94 1323 8 7.23 14.07 101.77 3. Justin Hunter, Tennessee 12 73 1083 9 6.08 14.84 90.25 4. Mike Evans, Texas A&M 13 82 1105 5 6.31 13.48 85.00 5. Donte Moncrief, Ole Miss 13 66 979 10 5.08 14.83 75.31 6. Amari Cooper, Alabama 14 59 1000 11 4.21 16.95 71.43 7. Chad Bumphis, Mississippi St. 13 58 922 12 4.46 15.90 70.92 8. Ryan Swope, Texas A&M 13 72 913 8 5.54 12.68 70.23 9. Tavarres King, Georgia 14 42 950 9 3.00 22.62 67.86 10. Emory Blake, Auburn 12 50 789 3 4.17 15.78 65.75 TOTAL RECEIVING YARDS Rank Player Gm Rec Yds TD RecGm YdsCat Yds/gm 1. Cobi Hamilton, Arkansas 12 90 1335 5 7.50 14.83 111.25 2. Jordan Matthews, Vanderbilt 13 94 1323 8 7.23 14.07 101.77 3. Mike Evans, Texas A&M 13 82 1105 5 6.31 13.48 85.00 4. Justin Hunter, Tennessee 12 73 1083 9 6.08 14.84 90.25 5. Amari Cooper, Alabama 14 59 1000 11 4.21 16.95 71.43 6. Donte Moncrief, Ole Miss 13 66 979 10 5.08 14.83 75.31 7. Tavarres King, Georgia 14 42 950 9 3.00 22.62 67.86 8. Chad Bumphis, Mississippi St. 13 58 922 12 4.46 15.90 70.92 9. Ryan Swope, Texas A&M 13 72 913 8 5.54 12.68 70.23 10. Emory Blake, Auburn 12 50 789 3 4.17 15.78 65.75 RUSHING Rank Player Gm Rush Yds TD Yds/gm 1. Johnny Manziel, Texas A&M 13 201 1410 21 108.46 2. Todd Gurley, Georgia 14 222 1385 17 98.93 3. Eddie Lacy, Alabama 14 204 1322 17 94.43 4. Mike Gillislee, Florida 13 244 1152 10 88.62 5. Zac Stacy, Vanderbilt 13 207 1141 10 87.77 6. Kendial Lawrence, Missouri 12 200 1025 12 85.42 7. Ladarius Perkins, Mississippi St. 12 205 1024 8 85.33 8. Tre Mason, Auburn 12 171 1002 8 83.50 9. T.J. Yeldon, Alabama 14 175 1108 12 79.14 10. Rajion Neal, Tennessee 10 156 708 5 70.80 SCORING Rank Player Gm TD Okm Oka FGM FGA Pts PtsGm 1. Johnny Manziel, Texas A&M 13 21 0 1 0 0 126 9.69 2. Drew Alleman, LSU 13 0 44 44 21 29 107 8.23 3. Caleb Sturgis, Florida 13 0 34 35 24 28 106 8.15 3. Taylor Bertolet, Texas A&M 13 0 67 74 13 22 106 8.15 5. Eddie Lacy, Alabama 14 19 0 0 0 0 114 8.14 6. Bryson Rose, Ole Miss 13 0 49 49 18 28 103 7.92 7. Todd Gurley, Georgia 14 18 0 0 0 0 108 7.71 8. Jeremy Shelley, Alabama 14 0 69 69 11 11 102 7.29 9. Carey Spear, Vanderbilt 13 0 27 27 20 24 87 6.69 10. Christine Michael, Texas A&M 11 12 0 0 0 0 72 6.55 TOTAL OFFENSE Rank Player Gm Rush Net Pyd Pl TotYd YdsPl YdsG 1. Johnny Manziel, Texas A&M 13 201 1410 3706 635 5116 8.06 393.54 2. Tyler Wilson, Arkansas 11 41 7 3387 442 3394 7.68 308.55 3. Tyler Bray, Tennessee 12 15 -34 3612 466 3578 7.68 298.17 4. Aaron Murray, Georgia 14 59 -68 3893 445 3825 8.60 273.21 5. Bo Wallace, Ole Miss 13 143 390 2994 511 3384 6.62 260.31 6. Tyler Russell, Mississippi St. 13 43 -5 2897 437 2892 6.62 222.46 7. Jordan Rodgers, Vanderbilt 12 91 71 2539 410 2610 6.37 217.50 8. Connor Shaw, South Carolina 11 131 435 1956 359 2391 6.66 217.36 9. A.J. McCarron, Alabama 14 49 4 2933 363 2937 8.09 209.79 10. James Franklin, Missouri 9 88 122 1562 322 1684 5.23 187.11 PASS EFFICIENCY DEFENSE Rank Team Gm Att Cmp PPct Int Yds YdAtt TD TDPct Rating 1. Florida 13 444 231 52.03 20 2503 5.64 7 1.58 95.55 2. Vanderbilt 13 432 232 53.70 11 2493 5.77 7 1.62 102.43 3. Alabama 14 397 217 54.66 18 2431 6.12 8 2.02 103.72 4. LSU 13 457 254 55.58 18 2678 5.86 15 3.28 107.78 5. South Carolina 13 379 213 56.20 15 2533 6.68 18 4.75 120.10 6. Georgia 14 351 200 56.98 13 2459 7.01 13 3.70 120.66 7. Texas A&M 13 485 281 57.94 12 3259 6.72 17 3.51 120.96 8. Mississippi St. 13 414 265 64.01 19 2883 6.96 17 4.11 126.87 9. Ole Miss 13 427 268 62.76 15 3205 7.51 22 5.15 135.83 10. Missouri 12 401 261 65.09 7 2897 7.22 19 4.74 137.93 11. Tennessee 12 446 272 60.99 12 3390 7.60 26 5.83 138.70 12. Auburn 12 358 235 65.64 2 2675 7.47 20 5.59 145.68 13. Kentucky 12 367 247 67.30 5 2757 7.51 21 5.72 146.56 14. Arkansas 12 419 262 62.53 6 3430 8.19 24 5.73 147.30 KICKOFF RETURNS Rank Team Gm Ret Yds TD Avg 1. Missouri 12 35 864 2 24.69 2. LSU 13 31 744 0 24.00 3. Alabama 14 21 503 1 23.95 4. Florida 13 36 835 1 23.19 5. Mississippi St. 13 44 1016 1 23.09 6. Auburn 12 36 808 1 22.44 7. Georgia 14 32 709 1 22.16 8. Vanderbilt 13 40 874 0 21.85 9. South Carolina 13 26 563 0 21.65 10. Kentucky 12 48 1009 0 21.02 11. Tennessee 12 51 1046 1 20.51 12. Ole Miss 13 43 861 1 20.02 13. Texas A&M 13 35 697 0 19.91 14. Arkansas 12 31 566 0 18.26 NET PUNTING Rank Team Punt Avg Ret RYds NetAvg TotYd 1. Arkansas 54 44 25 152 40.81 2416 2. LSU 71 44 17 59 40.68 3167 3. Florida 68 44 22 161 40.54 3038 4. Mississippi St. 57 41 13 6 39.89 2340 5. Texas A&M 41 41 13 70 39.78 1721 6. Alabama 50 44 18 117 39.54 2214 7. Kentucky 61 42 25 150 39.46 2617 8. Vanderbilt 61 44 20 214 39.43 2719 9. Auburn 70 39 5 4 38.56 2783 10. Tennessee 56 40 16 133 37.23 2278 11. Georgia 68 40 14 156 36.88 2784 12. Missouri 70 41 33 313 36.63 2937 13. Ole Miss 58 40 24 189 36.57 2350 14. South Carolina 58 38 11 52 36.03 2242 PASSING OFFENSE Rank Team Gm Att Cmp Int PPct Yds YdAtt TD YdsGm YdsCmp 1. Texas A&M 13 492 329 10 66.87 4114 8.36 28 316.46 12.50 2. Tennessee 12 477 285 14 59.75 3787 7.94 35 315.58 13.29 3. Arkansas 12 459 272 16 59.26 3618 7.88 23 301.50 13.30 4. Georgia 14 399 254 11 63.66 3991 10.00 37 285.07 15.71 5. Ole Miss 13 411 261 18 63.50 3249 7.91 24 249.92 12.45 6. South Carolina 13 365 225 9 61.64 3095 8.48 29 238.08 13.76 7. Mississippi St. 13 424 249 10 58.73 3091 7.29 28 237.77 12.41 8. Alabama 14 328 219 3 66.77 3052 9.30 31 218.00 13.94 9. Missouri 12 414 228 14 55.07 2615 6.32 15 217.92 11.47 10. Vanderbilt 13 350 207 5 59.14 2774 7.93 17 213.38 13.40 11. LSU 13 356 208 7 58.43 2607 7.32 12 200.54 12.53 12. Kentucky 12 387 220 10 56.85 2115 5.47 13 176.25 9.61 13. Auburn 12 257 147 15 57.20 1879 7.31 8 156.58 12.78 14. Florida 13 288 183 5 63.54 1902 6.60 13 146.31 10.39 PASS DEFENSE Rank Team Gm Att Cmp PPct YdsCmp Int Yds YdAtt TD YdsGm 1. Alabama 14 397 217 54.66 11.20 18 2431 6.12 8 173.64 2. Georgia 14 351 200 56.98 12.30 13 2459 7.01 13 175.64 3. Vanderbilt 13 432 232 53.70 10.75 11 2493 5.77 7 191.77 4. Florida 13 444 231 52.03 10.84 20 2503 5.64 7 192.54 5. South Carolina 13 379 213 56.20 11.89 15 2533 6.68 18 194.85 6. LSU 13 457 254 55.58 10.54 18 2678 5.86 15 206.00 7. Mississippi St. 13 414 265 64.01 10.88 19 2883 6.96 17 221.77 8. Auburn 12 358 235 65.64 11.38 2 2675 7.47 20 222.92 9. Kentucky 12 367 247 67.30 11.16 5 2757 7.51 21 229.75 10. Missouri 12 401 261 65.09 11.10 7 2897 7.22 19 241.42 11. Ole Miss 13 427 268 62.76 11.96 15 3205 7.51 22 246.54 12. Texas A&M 13 485 281 57.94 11.60 12 3259 6.72 17 250.69 13. Tennessee 12 446 272 60.99 12.46 12 3390 7.60 26 282.50 14. Arkansas 12 419 262 62.53 13.09 6 3430 8.19 24 285.83 PASSING EFFICIENCY Rank Team Gm Att Cmp PPct Int Yds YdAtt TD TPct Rating 1. Alabama 14 328 219 66.77 3 3052 9.30 31 9.45 174.32 2. Georgia 14 399 254 63.66 11 3991 10.00 37 9.27 172.81 3. South Carolina 13 365 225 61.64 9 3095 8.48 29 7.95 154.12 4. Texas A&M 13 492 329 66.87 10 4114 8.36 28 5.69 151.85 5. Tennessee 12 477 285 59.75 14 3787 7.94 35 7.34 144.73 6. Ole Miss 13 411 261 63.50 18 3249 7.91 24 5.84 140.41 7. Vanderbilt 13 350 207 59.14 5 2774 7.93 17 4.86 138.85 8. Mississippi St. 13 424 249 58.73 10 3091 7.29 28 6.60 137.01 9. Arkansas 12 459 272 59.26 16 3618 7.88 23 5.01 135.08 10. Florida 13 288 183 63.54 5 1902 6.60 13 4.51 130.40 11. LSU 13 356 208 58.43 7 2607 7.32 12 3.37 127.10 12. Auburn 12 257 147 57.20 15 1879 7.31 8 3.11 117.21 13. Missouri 12 414 228 55.07 14 2615 6.32 15 3.62 113.35 14. Kentucky 12 387 220 56.85 10 2115 5.47 13 3.36 108.62 PUNT RETURNS Rank Team Gm Ret Yds Tds Avg 1. Missouri 12 28 421 3 15.04 2. South Carolina 13 30 427 2 14.23 3. Florida 13 18 249 1 13.83 4. Texas A&M 13 34 452 1 13.29 5. Tennessee 12 22 261 1 11.86 6. Vanderbilt 13 35 366 3 10.46 7. Alabama 14 34 337 0 9.91 8. LSU 13 36 327 2 9.08 9. Auburn 12 18 161 0 8.94 10. Georgia 14 27 203 0 7.52 11. Kentucky 12 22 165 0 7.50 12. Mississippi St. 13 23 171 0 7.43 13. Arkansas 12 21 124 0 5.90 14. Ole Miss 13 24 134 0 5.58 RUSHING OFFENSE Rank Team Gm Rush Net Avg Tds YdsGm 1. Texas A&M 13 533 3147 5.90 46 242.08 2. Alabama 14 570 3185 5.59 37 227.50 3. Florida 13 539 2445 4.54 22 188.08 4. Georgia 14 525 2556 4.87 32 182.57 5. Ole Miss 13 551 2260 4.10 25 173.85 6. LSU 13 527 2258 4.28 29 173.69 7. Vanderbilt 13 524 2162 4.13 25 166.31 8. Tennessee 12 413 1924 4.66 18 160.33 9. Auburn 12 438 1781 4.07 16 148.42 10. Mississippi St. 13 424 1874 4.42 18 144.15 11. Kentucky 12 403 1665 4.13 13 138.75 12. Missouri 12 453 1662 3.67 16 138.50 13. South Carolina 13 491 1800 3.67 19 138.46 14. Arkansas 12 367 1424 3.88 12 118.67 RUSHING DEFENSE Rank Team Gm Rush Net Avg TD YdsGm 1. Alabama 14 440 1069 2.43 10 76.36 2. Florida 13 413 1234 2.99 12 94.92 3. LSU 13 440 1321 3.00 14 101.62 4. South Carolina 13 504 1569 3.11 9 120.69 5. Arkansas 12 440 1489 3.38 21 124.08 6. Ole Miss 13 483 1681 3.48 17 129.31 7. Texas A&M 13 487 1814 3.72 18 139.54 8. Vanderbilt 13 482 1848 3.83 17 142.15 9. Missouri 12 451 1791 3.97 26 149.25 10. Kentucky 12 481 1935 4.02 25 161.25 11. Mississippi St. 13 504 2153 4.27 16 165.62 12. Georgia 14 616 2550 4.14 17 182.14 13. Tennessee 12 477 2266 4.75 25 188.83 14. Auburn 12 484 2371 4.90 23 197.58 SCORING DEFENSE Rank Team Gm Pts PtGm TD Kxp Oxp Dkxp Doxp FG Sf 1. Alabama 14 153 10.93 20 18 0 0 0 5 0 2. Florida 13 188 14.46 21 18 0 1 0 14 0 3. LSU 13 228 17.54 29 24 0 0 0 10 0 4. South Carolina 13 237 18.23 27 24 0 0 0 17 0 5. Vanderbilt 13 243 18.69 27 23 2 0 0 18 0 6. Georgia 14 275 19.64 34 30 1 0 0 13 0 7. Texas A&M 13 283 21.77 36 29 1 0 0 12 0 8. Mississippi St. 13 303 23.31 37 36 0 0 0 15 0 9. Ole Miss 13 359 27.62 44 40 1 0 0 17 1 10. Auburn 12 340 28.33 44 44 0 0 0 10 1 11. Missouri 12 341 28.42 45 40 1 0 0 9 1 12. Arkansas 12 365 30.42 47 44 0 0 0 13 0 13. Kentucky 12 372 31.00 48 41 2 0 0 13 0 14. Tennessee 12 428 35.67 53 46 2 0 0 20 0 SCORING OFFENSE Rank Team Gm Yds TD Pts Avg Kxp Oxp Dkxp Doxp FG Sf 1. Texas A&M 13 7261 78 578 44.46 69 0 1 0 13 0 2. Alabama 14 6237 71 542 38.71 69 1 0 0 15 0 3. Georgia 14 6547 72 529 37.79 63 3 0 0 8 2 4. Tennessee 12 5711 56 434 36.17 49 1 0 0 15 1 5. South Carolina 13 4895 54 410 31.54 51 0 1 0 11 0 6. Ole Miss 13 5509 51 409 31.46 49 0 0 0 18 0 7. Vanderbilt 13 4936 47 390 30.00 46 0 0 0 20 1 8. LSU 13 4865 46 387 29.77 44 1 0 0 21 1 9. Mississippi St. 13 4965 49 383 29.46 47 0 0 0 14 0 10. Florida 13 4347 39 344 26.46 36 1 0 0 24 0 11. Missouri 12 4277 39 309 25.75 33 0 0 0 14 0 12. Arkansas 12 5042 35 282 23.50 33 0 0 0 13 0 13. Auburn 12 3660 27 224 18.67 27 0 0 0 11 1 14. Kentucky 12 3780 27 215 17.92 27 0 0 0 8 1 TOTAL DEFENSE Rank Team Gm Avg Plays Yds TD YdsGm 1. Alabama 14 4.18 837 3500 20 250.00 2. Florida 13 4.36 857 3737 21 287.46 3. LSU 13 4.46 897 3999 29 307.62 4. South Carolina 13 4.65 883 4102 27 315.54 5. Vanderbilt 13 4.75 914 4341 27 333.92 6. Georgia 14 5.18 967 5009 34 357.79 7. Ole Miss 13 5.37 910 4886 44 375.85 8. Mississippi St. 13 5.49 918 5036 37 387.38 9. Texas A&M 13 5.22 972 5073 36 390.23 10. Missouri 12 5.50 852 4688 45 390.67 11. Kentucky 12 5.53 848 4692 48 391.00 12. Arkansas 12 5.73 859 4919 47 409.92 13. Auburn 12 5.99 842 5046 44 420.50 14. Tennessee 12 6.13 923 5656 53 471.33 TOTAL OFFENSE Rank Team Gm Pl Yds Avg TD YdsGm 1. Texas A&M 13 1025 7261 7.08 78 558.54 2. Tennessee 12 890 5711 6.42 56 475.92 3. Georgia 14 924 6547 7.09 72 467.64 4. Alabama 14 898 6237 6.95 71 445.50 5. Ole Miss 13 962 5509 5.73 51 423.77 6. Arkansas 12 826 5042 6.10 35 420.17 7. Mississippi St. 13 848 4965 5.85 49 381.92 8. Vanderbilt 13 874 4936 5.65 47 379.69 9. South Carolina 13 856 4895 5.72 54 376.54 10. LSU 13 883 4865 5.51 46 374.23 11. Missouri 12 867 4277 4.93 39 356.42 12. Florida 13 827 4347 5.26 39 334.38 13. Kentucky 12 790 3780 4.78 27 315.00 14. Auburn 12 695 3660 5.27 27 305.00 TURNOVER MARGIN Rank Team Gm FGa IGa Gtot FLo ILo Ltot Mrgn 1. LSU 13 15 18 33 10 7 17 1.23 1. Mississippi St. 13 14 19 33 7 10 17 1.23 3. Florida 13 10 20 30 10 5 15 1.15 4. Alabama 14 11 18 29 12 3 15 1.00 5. Georgia 14 17 13 30 8 11 19 .79 6. South Carolina 13 9 15 24 11 9 20 .31 7. Missouri 12 16 7 23 8 14 22 .08 8. Vanderbilt 13 7 11 18 13 5 18 .00 9. Ole Miss 13 13 15 28 11 18 29 -.08 10. Kentucky 12 7 5 12 6 10 16 -.33 11. Texas A&M 13 4 12 16 11 10 21 -.38 12. Tennessee 12 5 12 17 8 14 22 -.42 13. Auburn 12 11 2 13 10 15 25 -1.00 14. Arkansas 12 6 6 12 15 16 31 -1.58