COLLEGE FOOTBALL STATISTICS
2011
Conference USA ALL-PURPOSE RUNNING Rank Player Gm Net Rec PR Kor Yards Yds/gm 1. Patrick Edwards, Houston 14 6 175 210 0 1968 140.57 2. Robert Kelley, Tulane 13 332 178 0 130 1815 139.62 3. Zach Line, SMU 10 1224 139 0 0 1363 136.30 4. Tracy Lampley, Southern Miss. 14 463 574 356 405 1798 128.43 5. Trey Watts, Tulsa 13 881 242 24 482 1629 125.31 6. Tyron Carrier, Houston 14 15 958 0 756 1729 123.50 7. Vernon Frazier, UTEP 12 434 56 0 884 1374 114.50 8. Charles Sims, Houston 13 821 575 0 0 1396 107.38 9. Tyler Smith, Rice 12 860 309 0 0 1169 97.42 10. Orleans Darkwa, Tulane 13 924 305 0 0 1229 94.54 FIELD GOALS Rank Player Gm Fga Fgm Avg FgPgm 1. Danny Hrapmann, Southern Miss. 14 34 23 .676 1.64 2. Chris Boswell, Rice 12 21 17 .810 1.42 3. Ty Long, UAB 12 19 16 .842 1.33 4. Dakota Warren, UTEP 11 22 13 .591 1.18 5. Kevin Fitzpatrick, Tulsa 13 18 15 .833 1.15 6. Michael Barbour, East Carolina 12 17 12 .706 1.00 6. Tyler Warner, Marshall 12 15 12 .800 1.00 8. Matt Hogan, Houston 14 17 13 .765 .93 9. Cairo Santos, Tulane 13 18 11 .611 .85 10. Nick Cattoi, UCF 12 15 10 .667 .83 INTERCEPTIONS Rank Player Gm Int Yds TD IntPg 1. Bryce Callahan, Rice 12 6 25 0 .50 2. Dexter McCoil, Tulsa 13 6 131 1 .46 3. Phillip Steward, Houston 14 6 61 0 .43 4. Damon Magazu, East Carolina 12 4 37 0 .33 4. Rashad Jackson, Marshall 12 4 47 0 .33 6. Omar Brown, Marshall 13 4 55 1 .31 6. Milton Howell, Tulsa 13 4 44 0 .31 6. Ryan Travis, Tulane 13 4 59 1 .31 9. Deron Wilson, Southern Miss. 14 4 114 2 .29 10. Akeem Davis, Memphis 12 3 43 0 .25 KICKOFF RETURN Rank Player Gm KRet Yds TD Avg RetGm 1. Rannell Hall, UCF 12 23 714 0 31.04 1.92 2. Vernon Frazier, UTEP 12 29 884 0 30.48 2.42 3. Tyron Carrier, Houston 14 30 756 1 25.20 2.14 4. Andre Booker, Marshall 13 33 819 0 24.82 2.54 5. Trey Watts, Tulsa 13 20 482 1 24.10 1.54 6. Nick Adams, UAB 12 20 456 1 22.80 1.67 7. Demetrius Evans, Marshall 12 18 397 0 22.06 1.50 8. D.J. Vinson, UAB 12 22 473 0 21.50 1.83 9. Tracy Lampley, Southern Miss. 14 19 405 0 21.32 1.36 10. James Richardson, SMU 10 26 553 0 21.27 2.60 PASSING EFFICIENCY Rank Player Gm Att Cmp CPct Int PYds YdsAtt TD Rating 1. Case Keenum, Houston 14 603 428 70.98 5 5631 9.34 48 174.03 2. Blake Bortles, UCF 10 110 75 68.18 3 958 8.71 6 153.88 3. G.J. Kinne, Tulsa 13 390 247 63.33 12 3090 7.92 28 147.43 4. Jeff Godfrey, UCF 12 232 160 68.97 5 1898 8.18 5 140.49 5. Austin Davis, Southern Miss. 14 475 286 60.21 11 3496 7.36 30 138.25 6. Dominique Davis, East Carolina 12 494 334 67.61 19 3225 6.53 25 131.46 7. Nick Lamaison, UTEP 9 224 130 58.04 10 1718 7.67 12 131.21 8. J.J. McDermott, SMU 13 455 272 59.78 16 3421 7.52 17 128.23 9. Rakeem Cato, Marshall 13 304 182 59.87 11 2059 6.77 15 125.81 10. Jonathan Perry, UAB 12 300 174 58.00 8 2042 6.81 10 120.84 PUNTING Rank Player Gm Punt Yds Avg PuntG 1. Ian Campbell, UTEP 12 48 2214 46.13 4.00 2. Kyle Martens, Rice 12 78 3403 43.63 6.50 3. Tom Hornsey, Memphis 12 95 3993 42.03 7.92 4. Jonathan Ginsburgh, Tulane 12 59 2458 41.66 4.92 5. Richie Leone, Houston 14 51 2103 41.24 3.64 6. Trey Ragland, UAB 12 55 2235 40.64 4.58 7. Kase Whitehead, Marshall 13 76 3044 40.05 5.85 8. Matt Stone, SMU 13 56 2111 37.70 4.31 PUNT RETURN Rank Player Gm Ret Yds TD Avg RetGm 1. Richard Crawford, SMU 13 16 189 1 11.81 1.23 2. Tracy Lampley, Southern Miss. 14 31 356 1 11.48 2.21 3. Andre Booker, Marshall 13 18 195 1 10.83 1.38 4. Derrick Strozier, Tulane 11 18 187 0 10.39 1.64 5. Mario Hull, Rice 12 16 163 0 10.19 1.33 6. J.J. Worton, UCF 12 17 150 0 8.82 1.42 RECEPTIONS PER GAME Rank Player Gm Rec Yds TD RecGm YdsCat Yds/gm 1. Cole Beasley, SMU 12 86 1040 2 7.17 12.09 86.67 2. Tyron Carrier, Houston 14 96 958 5 6.86 9.98 68.43 3. Lance Lewis, East Carolina 9 60 600 8 6.67 10.00 66.67 4. Patrick Edwards, Houston 14 89 1752 20 6.36 19.69 125.14 5. Justin Johnson, Houston 14 87 1229 12 6.21 14.13 87.79 6. Darius Johnson, SMU 13 79 1118 8 6.08 14.15 86.00 7. Tannar Rehrer, Memphis 12 70 593 4 5.83 8.47 49.42 8. Justin Hardy, East Carolina 11 64 658 6 5.82 10.28 59.82 9. Willie Carter, Tulsa 11 61 868 7 5.55 14.23 78.91 10. Jackie Williams, UAB 11 58 607 0 5.27 10.47 55.18 RECEIVING YARDS PER GAME Rank Player Gm Rec Yds TD RecGm YdsCat Yds/gm 1. Patrick Edwards, Houston 14 89 1752 20 6.36 19.69 125.14 2. Justin Johnson, Houston 14 87 1229 12 6.21 14.13 87.79 3. Cole Beasley, SMU 12 86 1040 2 7.17 12.09 86.67 4. Darius Johnson, SMU 13 79 1118 8 6.08 14.15 86.00 5. Willie Carter, Tulsa 11 61 868 7 5.55 14.23 78.91 6. Tyron Carrier, Houston 14 96 958 5 6.86 9.98 68.43 7. Lance Lewis, East Carolina 9 60 600 8 6.67 10.00 66.67 8. Bryan Burnham, Tulsa 13 54 850 9 4.15 15.74 65.38 9. Justin Hardy, East Carolina 11 64 658 6 5.82 10.28 59.82 10. Jackie Williams, UAB 11 58 607 0 5.27 10.47 55.18 TOTAL RECEIVING YARDS Rank Player Gm Rec Yds TD RecGm YdsCat Yds/gm 1. Patrick Edwards, Houston 14 89 1752 20 6.36 19.69 125.14 2. Justin Johnson, Houston 14 87 1229 12 6.21 14.13 87.79 3. Darius Johnson, SMU 13 79 1118 8 6.08 14.15 86.00 4. Cole Beasley, SMU 12 86 1040 2 7.17 12.09 86.67 5. Tyron Carrier, Houston 14 96 958 5 6.86 9.98 68.43 6. Willie Carter, Tulsa 11 61 868 7 5.55 14.23 78.91 7. Bryan Burnham, Tulsa 13 54 850 9 4.15 15.74 65.38 8. Ryan Balentine, Southern Miss. 14 49 742 8 3.50 15.14 53.00 9. Kelvin Bolden, Southern Miss. 13 58 671 7 4.46 11.57 51.62 10. Aaron Dobson, Marshall 13 49 668 12 3.77 13.63 51.38 RUSHING Rank Player Gm Rush Yds TD Yds/gm 1. Zach Line, SMU 10 208 1224 17 122.40 2. Tyler Smith, Rice 12 155 860 5 71.67 3. Orleans Darkwa, Tulane 13 210 924 13 71.08 4. Joe Banyard, UTEP 12 127 832 6 69.33 5. Ja'Terian Douglas, Tulsa 13 112 883 4 67.92 6. Trey Watts, Tulsa 13 157 881 3 67.77 7. Charles Sims, Houston 13 110 821 9 63.15 8. Jamal Woodyard, Southern Miss. 13 110 732 3 56.31 9. Michael Hayes, Houston 13 138 727 11 55.92 10. Tron Martinez, Marshall 12 160 649 3 54.08 SCORING Rank Player Gm TD Okm Oka FGM FGA Pts PtsGm 1. Zach Line, SMU 10 17 0 0 0 0 102 10.20 2. Matt Hogan, Houston 14 0 91 92 13 17 130 9.29 2. Danny Hrapmann, Southern Miss. 14 0 61 62 23 34 130 9.29 4. Patrick Edwards, Houston 14 21 0 0 0 0 126 9.00 5. Kevin Fitzpatrick, Tulsa 13 0 51 53 15 18 96 7.38 6. Michael Hayes, Houston 13 15 0 0 0 0 90 6.92 7. Chris Boswell, Rice 12 0 31 32 17 21 82 6.83 8. Dakota Warren, UTEP 11 0 32 34 13 22 71 6.45 9. Michael Barbour, East Carolina 12 0 39 40 12 17 75 6.25 10. Orleans Darkwa, Tulane 13 13 0 0 0 0 78 6.00 10. Charles Sims, Houston 13 13 0 0 0 0 78 6.00 10. Leilyon Myers, UTEP 12 12 0 0 0 0 72 6.00 10. Ty Long, UAB 12 0 24 25 16 19 72 6.00 TOTAL OFFENSE Rank Player Gm Rush Net Pyd Pl TotYd YdsPl YdsGm 1. Case Keenum, Houston 14 57 35 5631 660 5666 8.58 404.71 2. Dominique Davis, East Carolina 12 93 172 3225 587 3397 5.79 283.08 3. Austin Davis, Southern Miss. 14 110 352 3496 585 3848 6.58 274.86 4. G.J. Kinne, Tulsa 13 125 405 3090 515 3495 6.79 268.85 5. J.J. McDermott, SMU 13 40 -123 3421 495 3298 6.66 253.69 6. Nick Lamaison, UTEP 9 40 39 1718 264 1757 6.66 195.22 7. Jonathan Perry, UAB 12 92 294 2042 392 2336 5.96 194.67 8. Jeff Godfrey, UCF 12 111 405 1898 343 2303 6.71 191.92 9. Ryan Griffin, Tulane 13 50 -10 2502 458 2492 5.44 191.69 10. Rakeem Cato, Marshall 13 57 32 2059 361 2091 5.79 160.85 PASS EFFICIENCY DEFENSE Rank Team Gm Att Cmp PPct Int Yds YdAtt TD TDPct Rating 1. Southern Miss. 14 535 308 57.57 19 3142 5.87 14 2.62 108.47 2. UCF 12 385 208 54.03 9 2334 6.06 12 3.12 110.53 3. Houston 14 469 258 55.01 21 2922 6.23 19 4.05 111.75 4. SMU 13 443 284 64.11 6 2882 6.51 15 3.39 127.21 5. Tulsa 13 516 307 59.50 18 3722 7.21 25 4.84 129.10 6. UTEP 12 404 242 59.90 12 3020 7.48 16 3.96 129.82 7. East Carolina 12 354 214 60.45 7 2426 6.85 17 4.80 129.96 8. Marshall 13 460 288 62.61 14 3317 7.21 24 5.22 134.30 9. Tulane 13 422 260 61.61 12 3190 7.56 20 4.74 135.05 10. Memphis 12 432 279 64.58 12 3593 8.32 27 6.25 149.53 11. Rice 12 399 246 61.65 13 3344 8.38 32 8.02 152.05 12. UAB 12 403 286 70.97 9 3387 8.40 26 6.45 158.42 KICKOFF RETURNS Rank Team Gm Ret Yds TD Avg 1. UCF 12 42 1131 1 26.93 2. UTEP 12 49 1291 0 26.35 3. Southern Miss. 14 52 1174 0 22.58 4. Marshall 13 57 1272 0 22.32 5. Houston 14 41 906 1 22.10 6. Tulsa 13 51 1115 1 21.86 7. Tulane 13 83 1667 0 20.08 8. UAB 12 73 1460 1 20.00 9. SMU 13 39 779 0 19.97 10. Rice 12 49 951 0 19.41 11. East Carolina 12 58 1114 0 19.21 12. Memphis 12 67 1207 0 18.01 NET PUNTING Rank Team Punt Avg Ret RYds NetAvg TotYd 1. UTEP 48 46 22 150 40.50 2214 2. Rice 80 43 22 137 39.71 3454 3. Southern Miss. 56 43 16 98 39.02 2443 4. UAB 57 41 14 66 37.39 2337 5. Marshall 76 40 22 177 36.54 3054 6. Tulsa 59 39 18 154 36.25 2353 7. Houston 51 41 11 116 36.22 2103 8. Tulane 74 41 30 388 35.20 3073 9. Memphis 95 42 48 557 35.12 3993 10. SMU 57 37 28 130 34.47 2135 11. UCF 42 41 14 204 33.05 1732 12. East Carolina 51 39 24 439 29.63 2030 PASSING OFFENSE Rank Team Gm Att Cmp Int PPct Yds YdAtt TD YdsGm YdsCmp 1. Houston 14 682 479 6 70.23 6301 9.24 54 450.07 13.15 2. East Carolina 12 524 355 20 67.75 3433 6.55 25 286.08 9.67 3. SMU 13 476 281 19 59.03 3573 7.51 17 274.85 12.72 4. Southern Miss. 14 489 292 12 59.71 3587 7.34 32 256.21 12.28 5. Tulsa 13 421 256 17 60.81 3233 7.68 31 248.69 12.63 6. UCF 12 346 235 8 67.92 2856 8.25 11 238.00 12.15 7. UAB 12 440 246 15 55.91 2815 6.40 12 234.58 11.44 8. UTEP 12 399 225 17 56.39 2707 6.78 14 225.58 12.03 9. Tulane 13 461 248 15 53.80 2782 6.03 13 214.00 11.22 10. Marshall 13 407 246 15 60.44 2773 6.81 22 213.31 11.27 11. Rice 12 384 222 7 57.81 2361 6.15 15 196.75 10.64 12. Memphis 12 408 224 8 54.90 2283 5.60 10 190.25 10.19 PASS DEFENSE Rank Team Gm Att Cmp PPct YdsCmp Int Yds YdAtt TD YdsGm 1. UCF 12 385 208 54.03 11.22 9 2334 6.06 12 194.50 2. East Carolina 12 354 214 60.45 11.34 7 2426 6.85 17 202.17 3. Houston 14 469 258 55.01 11.33 21 2922 6.23 19 208.71 4. SMU 13 443 284 64.11 10.15 6 2882 6.51 15 221.69 5. Southern Miss. 14 535 308 57.57 10.20 19 3142 5.87 14 224.43 6. Tulane 13 422 260 61.61 12.27 12 3190 7.56 20 245.38 7. UTEP 12 404 242 59.90 12.48 12 3020 7.48 16 251.67 8. Marshall 13 460 288 62.61 11.52 14 3317 7.21 24 255.15 9. Rice 12 399 246 61.65 13.59 13 3344 8.38 32 278.67 10. UAB 12 403 286 70.97 11.84 9 3387 8.40 26 282.25 11. Tulsa 13 516 307 59.50 12.12 18 3722 7.21 25 286.31 12. Memphis 12 432 279 64.58 12.88 12 3593 8.32 27 299.42 PASSING EFFICIENCY Rank Team Gm Att Cmp PPct Int Yds YdAtt TD TPct Rating 1. Houston 14 682 479 70.23 6 6301 9.24 54 7.92 172.18 2. UCF 12 346 235 67.92 8 2856 8.25 11 3.18 143.10 3. Tulsa 13 421 256 60.81 17 3233 7.68 31 7.36 141.53 4. Southern Miss. 14 489 292 59.71 12 3587 7.34 32 6.54 138.00 5. East Carolina 12 524 355 67.75 20 3433 6.55 25 4.77 130.84 6. Marshall 13 407 246 60.44 15 2773 6.81 22 5.41 128.10 7. SMU 13 476 281 59.03 19 3573 7.51 17 3.57 125.86 8. Rice 12 384 222 57.81 7 2361 6.15 15 3.91 118.69 9. UTEP 12 399 225 56.39 17 2707 6.78 14 3.51 116.45 10. UAB 12 440 246 55.91 15 2815 6.40 12 2.73 111.82 11. Tulane 13 461 248 53.80 15 2782 6.03 13 2.82 107.29 12. Memphis 12 408 224 54.90 8 2283 5.60 10 2.45 106.07 PUNT RETURNS Rank Team Gm Ret Yds Tds Avg 1. Houston 14 24 317 2 13.21 2. Southern Miss. 14 35 448 4 12.80 3. Marshall 13 21 246 1 11.71 4. East Carolina 12 15 162 0 10.80 5. SMU 13 21 217 1 10.33 6. UAB 12 14 143 0 10.21 7. UTEP 12 22 220 1 10.00 8. Tulane 13 22 205 0 9.32 9. Memphis 12 10 93 0 9.30 10. Rice 12 24 215 0 8.96 11. UCF 12 24 201 0 8.38 12. Tulsa 13 14 82 0 5.86 RUSHING OFFENSE Rank Team Gm Rush Net Avg Tds YdsGm 1. Southern Miss. 14 553 2872 5.19 17 205.14 2. Tulsa 13 521 2492 4.78 20 191.69 3. UCF 12 466 2025 4.35 27 168.75 4. UTEP 12 410 1859 4.53 24 154.92 5. Rice 12 467 1811 3.88 13 150.92 6. Houston 14 420 2086 4.97 33 149.00 7. UAB 12 402 1553 3.86 13 129.42 8. Tulane 13 429 1642 3.83 17 126.31 9. Marshall 13 446 1561 3.50 9 120.08 10. SMU 13 355 1479 4.17 25 113.77 11. East Carolina 12 397 1309 3.30 15 109.08 12. Memphis 12 378 1008 2.67 10 84.00 RUSHING DEFENSE Rank Team Gm Rush Net Avg TD YdsGm 1. UCF 12 347 1306 3.76 9 108.83 2. SMU 13 466 1538 3.30 17 118.31 3. Southern Miss. 14 506 1660 3.28 16 118.57 4. Tulsa 13 509 1670 3.28 20 128.46 5. Marshall 13 470 1948 4.14 19 149.85 6. Tulane 13 467 2144 4.59 37 164.92 7. Houston 14 576 2402 4.17 18 171.57 8. East Carolina 12 460 2090 4.54 24 174.17 9. Rice 12 457 2201 4.82 18 183.42 10. UTEP 12 434 2278 5.25 24 189.83 11. Memphis 12 455 2299 5.05 25 191.58 12. UAB 12 466 2440 5.24 26 203.33 SCORING DEFENSE Rank Team Gm Pts PtGm TD Kxp Oxp Dkxp Doxp FG Sf 1. UCF 12 220 18.33 25 21 2 0 0 15 0 2. Southern Miss. 14 291 20.79 35 32 1 0 0 15 1 3. Houston 14 314 22.43 40 38 0 0 0 12 0 4. SMU 13 300 23.08 36 33 0 0 0 17 0 5. Tulsa 13 355 27.31 46 41 0 0 0 12 1 6. Marshall 13 372 28.62 47 43 0 0 0 15 1 7. UTEP 12 364 30.33 47 45 2 0 0 11 0 8. East Carolina 12 387 32.25 51 48 0 0 0 11 0 9. Rice 12 400 33.33 53 50 0 0 0 10 1 10. Memphis 12 421 35.08 55 50 1 0 0 13 0 11. UAB 12 441 36.75 58 58 0 0 0 11 1 12. Tulane 13 487 37.46 62 58 0 0 0 19 0 SCORING OFFENSE Rank Team Gm Yds TD Pts Avg Kxp Oxp Dkxp Doxp FG Sf 1. Houston 14 8387 93 690 49.29 91 1 0 0 13 0 2. Southern Miss. 14 6459 63 516 36.86 61 1 0 0 25 0 3. Tulsa 13 5725 55 430 33.08 51 2 0 0 15 0 4. UCF 12 4881 40 325 27.08 38 0 0 0 15 1 5. UTEP 12 4566 40 319 26.58 35 0 0 0 14 1 6. East Carolina 12 4742 40 315 26.25 39 0 0 0 12 0 7. SMU 13 5052 45 336 25.85 42 0 0 0 8 0 8. Rice 12 4172 33 280 23.33 31 0 0 0 17 0 9. Marshall 13 4334 35 284 21.85 33 0 0 0 13 1 10. Tulane 13 4424 34 274 21.08 33 0 0 0 11 2 11. UAB 12 4368 28 242 20.17 24 1 0 0 16 0 12. Memphis 12 3291 25 195 16.25 21 0 0 0 8 0 TOTAL DEFENSE Rank Team Gm Avg Plays Yds TD YdsGm 1. UCF 12 4.97 732 3640 25 303.33 2. SMU 13 4.86 909 4420 36 340.00 3. Southern Miss. 14 4.61 104 4802 35 343.00 4. East Carolina 12 5.55 814 4516 51 376.33 5. Houston 14 5.09 104 5324 40 380.29 6. Marshall 13 5.66 930 5265 47 405.00 7. Tulane 13 6.00 889 5334 62 410.31 8. Tulsa 13 5.26 102 5392 46 414.77 9. UTEP 12 6.32 838 5298 47 441.50 10. Rice 12 6.48 856 5545 53 462.08 11. UAB 12 6.71 869 5827 58 485.58 12. Memphis 12 6.64 887 5892 55 491.00 TOTAL OFFENSE Rank Team Gm Pl Yds Avg TD YdsGm 1. Houston 14 110 8387 7.61 93 599.07 2. Southern Miss. 14 104 6459 6.20 63 461.36 3. Tulsa 13 942 5725 6.08 55 440.38 4. UCF 12 812 4881 6.01 40 406.75 5. East Carolina 12 921 4742 5.15 40 395.17 6. SMU 13 831 5052 6.08 45 388.62 7. UTEP 12 809 4566 5.64 40 380.50 8. UAB 12 842 4368 5.19 28 364.00 9. Rice 12 851 4172 4.90 33 347.67 10. Tulane 13 890 4424 4.97 34 340.31 11. Marshall 13 853 4334 5.08 35 333.38 12. Memphis 12 786 3291 4.19 25 274.25 TURNOVER MARGIN Rank Team Gm FGa IGa Gtot FLo ILo Ltot Mrgn 1. Houston 14 10 21 31 9 6 15 1.14 2. Memphis 12 18 12 30 10 8 18 1.00 3. Rice 12 14 13 27 12 7 19 .67 4. Marshall 13 15 14 29 12 15 27 .15 5. Southern Miss. 14 9 19 28 18 12 30 -.14 6. UCF 12 6 9 15 10 8 18 -.25 7. UAB 12 12 9 21 11 15 26 -.42 8. Tulsa 13 10 18 28 17 17 34 -.46 9. Tulane 13 7 12 19 11 15 26 -.54 10. UTEP 12 7 12 19 10 17 27 -.67 11. East Carolina 12 14 7 21 15 20 35 -1.17 12. SMU 13 10 6 16 13 19 32 -1.23