COLLEGE FOOTBALL STATISTICS

2011
 Big East Conference 
 
 ALL-PURPOSE RUNNING
 
 Rank           Player                     Gm  Net Rec  PR Kor Yards Yds/gm
  1. Tavon Austin, West Virginia           13  182 118 268 938  2574 198.00
  2. Isaiah Pead, Cincinnati               13 1259 319  74   0  1652 127.08
  3. Lyle McCombs, Connecticut             12 1151 172   0   0  1323 110.25
  4. Nick Williams, Connecticut            12    3 236 123 920  1282 106.83
  5. Antwon Bailey, Syracuse               12 1051 200   0   0  1251 104.25
  6. Stedman Bailey, West Virginia         13    0 127   0  67  1346 103.54
  7. Mohamed Sanu, Rutgers                 13   -2 120  55   0  1259  96.85
  8. Lindsey Lamar, South Fla.             12  150 157   0 817  1124  93.67
  9. Darrell Scott, South Fla.             11  814 169   0   0   983  89.36
 10. Jeremiah Kobena, Syracuse             12   10   4   0 102  1041  86.75
 
 FIELD GOALS
 
 Rank           Player                    Gm Fga Fgm   Avg FgPgm
  1. Dave Teggart, Connecticut            12  28  22  .786  1.83
  2. Kevin Harper, Pittsburgh             13  31  21  .677  1.62
  3. Maikon Bonani, South Fla.            12  26  19  .731  1.58
  4. San San Te, Rutgers                  13  31  20  .645  1.54
  5. Tony Miliano, Cincinnati             13  25  17  .680  1.31
  6. Ross Krautman, Syracuse              12  19  15  .789  1.25
  7. Tyler Bitancurt, West Virginia       13  22  16  .727  1.23
  8. Chris Philpott, Louisville           13  18  12  .667   .92
 
 INTERCEPTIONS
 
 Rank           Player                 Gm Int Yds  TD IntPgm
  1. Phillip Thomas, Syracuse          10   6  50   0    .60
  2. Duron Harmon, Rutgers             13   5  86   1    .38
  3. Keith Tandy, West Virginia        13   4  63   0    .31
  4. Sio Moore, Connecticut            12   3  -2   0    .25
  4. Dwayne Gratz, Connecticut         12   3  32   0    .25
  4. Ty-Meer Brown, Connecticut        12   3  52   1    .25
  7. Logan Ryan, Rutgers               13   3  56   1    .23
  7. David Rowe, Rutgers               13   3  27   0    .23
  7. Steve Beauharnais, Rutgers        13   3  53   0    .23
  7. Dexter Heyman, Louisville         13   3  18   0    .23
  7. J.K. Schaffer, Cincinnati         13   3  41   0    .23
  7. Camerron Cheatham, Cincinnati     13   3  70   1    .23
  7. Deven Drane, Cincinnati           13   3  43   0    .23
 
 KICKOFF RETURN
 
 Rank           Player                     Gm KRet  Yds  TD    Avg  RetGm
  1. Jeremy Deering, Rutgers               12   17  530   1  31.18   1.42
  2. Ralph David Abernathy IV, Cincinnati  13   39 1034   1  26.51   3.00
  3. Tavon Austin, West Virginia           13   36  938   2  26.06   2.77
  4. Nick Williams, Connecticut            12   37  920   0  24.86   3.08
  5. Jeremy Wright, Louisville             12   18  425   0  23.61   1.50
  6. Buddy Jackson, Pittsburgh             13   23  543   1  23.61   1.77
  7. Jeremiah Kobena, Syracuse             12   45 1027   0  22.82   3.75
  8. Corey Davis, Pittsburgh               12   17  359   0  21.12   1.42
  9. Lindsey Lamar, South Fla.             12   40  817   0  20.43   3.33
 10. Jordan Thomas, Rutgers                13   16  310   0  19.38   1.23
 
 PASSING EFFICIENCY
 
 Rank           Player              Gm Att Cmp  CPct Int  PYds YdsAtt  TD Rating
  1. Geno Smith, West Virginia      13 526 346 65.78   7  4385   8.34  31 152.59
  2. Teddy Bridgewater, Louisville  13 296 191 64.53  12  2129   7.19  14 132.44
  3. Zach Collaros, Cincinnati      10 272 166 61.03  10  1934   7.11  15 131.60
  4. Ryan Nassib, Syracuse          12 415 259 62.41   9  2685   6.47  22 129.91
  5. B.J. Daniels, South Fla.       11 365 215 58.90   7  2604   7.13  13 126.75
  6. Tino Sunseri, Pittsburgh       13 385 247 64.16  11  2616   6.79  10 124.09
  7. Gary Nova, Rutgers             10 227 116 51.10   9  1553   6.84  11 116.63
  8. Johnny McEntee, Connecticut    12 335 172 51.34   8  2110   6.30  12 111.30
  9. Munchie Legaux, Cincinnati     11 116  55 47.41   4   749   6.46   5 108.98
 
 PUNTING
 
 Rank           Player                     Gm Punt  Yds    Avg  PuntGm
  1. Pat O'Donnell, Cincinnati             13   63 2760  43.81    4.85
  2. Matt Yoklic, Pittsburgh               13   62 2554  41.19    4.77
  3. Cole Wagner, Connecticut              12   80 3288  41.10    6.67
  4. Justin Doerner, Rutgers               13   64 2577  40.27    4.92
  5. Jonathan Fisher, Syracuse              9   43 1690  39.30    4.78
  6. Justin Brockhaus-Kann, South Fla.     12   62 2253  36.34    5.17
 
 PUNT RETURN
 
 Rank           Player                      Gm Ret Yds  TD    Avg  RetGm
  1. Tavon Austin, West Virginia            13  19 268   0  14.11   1.46
  2. Nick Williams, Connecticut             12  22 123   0   5.59   1.83
 
 RECEPTIONS PER GAME
 
 Rank           Player                     Gm Rec  Yds  TD  RecGm YdsCat   YdsGm
  1. Mohamed Sanu, Rutgers                 13 115 1206   7   8.85  10.49   92.77
  2. Tavon Austin, West Virginia           13 101 1186   8   7.77  11.74   91.23
  3. Alec Lemon, Syracuse                  12  68  834   6   5.67  12.26   69.50
  4. Stedman Bailey, West Virginia         13  72 1279  12   5.54  17.76   98.38
  5. Nick Provo, Syracuse                  12  51  537   7   4.25  10.53   44.75
  6. Devin Street, Pittsburgh              13  53  754   2   4.08  14.23   58.00
  7. Ivan Mccartney, West Virginia         13  49  585   3   3.77  11.94   45.00
  7. Anthony McClung, Cincinnati           13  49  683   6   3.77  13.94   52.54
  9. Isiah Moore, Connecticut              12  43  566   0   3.58  13.16   47.17
 10. Kashif Moore, Connecticut             12  41  604   5   3.42  14.73   50.33
 
 RECEIVING YARDS PER GAME
 
 Rank           Player                   Gm  Rec  Yds  TD  RecGm YdsCat  Yds/gm
  1. Stedman Bailey, West Virginia       13   72 1279  12   5.54  17.76   98.38
  2. Mohamed Sanu, Rutgers               13  115 1206   7   8.85  10.49   92.77
  3. Tavon Austin, West Virginia         13  101 1186   8   7.77  11.74   91.23
  4. Alec Lemon, Syracuse                12   68  834   6   5.67  12.26   69.50
  5. Devin Street, Pittsburgh            13   53  754   2   4.08  14.23   58.00
  6. Anthony McClung, Cincinnati         13   49  683   6   3.77  13.94   52.54
  7. Kashif Moore, Connecticut           12   41  604   5   3.42  14.73   50.33
  8. Isiah Moore, Connecticut            12   43  566   0   3.58  13.16   47.17
  9. Ivan Mccartney, West Virginia       13   49  585   3   3.77  11.94   45.00
 10. Nick Provo, Syracuse                12   51  537   7   4.25  10.53   44.75
 
 TOTAL RECEIVING YARDS
 
 Rank           Player                     Gm Rec  Yds  TD  RecGm YdsCat Yds/gm
  1. Stedman Bailey, West Virginia         13  72 1279  12   5.54  17.76  98.38
  2. Mohamed Sanu, Rutgers                 13 115 1206   7   8.85  10.49  92.77
  3. Tavon Austin, West Virginia           13 101 1186   8   7.77  11.74  91.23
  4. Alec Lemon, Syracuse                  12  68  834   6   5.67  12.26  69.50
  5. Devin Street, Pittsburgh              13  53  754   2   4.08  14.23  58.00
  6. Anthony McClung, Cincinnati           13  49  683   6   3.77  13.94  52.54
  7. Kashif Moore, Connecticut             12  41  604   5   3.42  14.73  50.33
  8. Ivan Mccartney, West Virginia         13  49  585   3   3.77  11.94  45.00
  9. Isiah Moore, Connecticut              12  43  566   0   3.58  13.16  47.17
 10. Brandon Coleman, Rutgers              13  17  552   6   1.31  32.47  42.46
 
 RUSHING
 
 Rank           Player                     Gm Rush  Yds   TD Yds/gm
  1. Isaiah Pead, Cincinnati               13  237 1259   12  96.85
  2. Lyle McCombs, Connecticut             12  275 1151    7  95.92
  3. Antwon Bailey, Syracuse               12  240 1051    6  87.58
  4. Jawan Jamison, Rutgers                12  231  897    9  74.75
  5. Darrell Scott, South Fla.             11  153  814    5  74.00
  6. Dustin Garrison, West Virginia        12  136  742    6  61.83
  7. B.J. Daniels, South Fla.              11  132  601    6  54.64
  8. Vic Anderson, Louisville              11  114  539    3  49.00
  9. Dominique Brown, Louisville           12  140  533    4  44.42
 10. Demetris Murray, South Fla.           12  121  503    8  41.92
 
 SCORING
 
 Rank          Player                   Gm  TD Okm Oka FGM FGA Pts  PtsGm
  1. Tyler Bitancurt, West Virginia     13   0  61  63  16  22 109   8.38
  2. Maikon Bonani, South Fla.          12   0  42  42  19  26  99   8.25
  3. Dave Teggart, Connecticut          12   0  29  30  22  28  95   7.92
  4. Tony Miliano, Cincinnati           13   0  47  50  17  25  98   7.54
  5. San San Te, Rutgers                13   0  37  38  20  31  97   7.46
  6. Kevin Harper, Pittsburgh           13   0  32  33  21  31  95   7.31
  7. Isaiah Pead, Cincinnati            13  15   0   0   0   0  90   6.92
  8. Shawne Alston, West Virginia       11  12   0   0   0   0  72   6.55
  9. Ross Krautman, Syracuse            12   0  33  34  15  19  78   6.50
 10. Stedman Bailey, West Virginia      13  12   0   0   0   0  72   5.54
 
 TOTAL OFFENSE
 
 Rank           Player                 Gm Rush  Net  Pyd   Pl TotYd YdsPl  YdsGm
  1. Geno Smith, West Virginia         13   56  -33 4385  582  4352  7.48 334.77
  2. B.J. Daniels, South Fla.          11  132  601 2604  497  3205  6.45 291.36
  3. Ryan Nassib, Syracuse             12   65   39 2685  480  2724  5.68 227.00
  4. Zach Collaros, Cincinnati         10   84  234 1934  356  2168  6.09 216.80
  5. Tino Sunseri, Pittsburgh          13  154   86 2616  539  2702  5.01 207.85
  6. Teddy Bridgewater, Louisville     13   89   66 2129  385  2195  5.70 168.85
  7. Johnny McEntee, Connecticut       12   55 -148 2110  390  1962  5.03 163.50
  8. Gary Nova, Rutgers                10   23 -114 1553  250  1439  5.76 143.90
  9. Isaiah Pead, Cincinnati           13  237 1259    0  237  1259  5.31  96.85
 10. Lyle McCombs, Connecticut         12  275 1151    0  275  1151  4.19  95.92
 
 PASS EFFICIENCY DEFENSE
 
 Rank           Team        Gm Att Cmp  PPct Int   Yds YdAtt  TD TDPct  Rating
  1. Rutgers                13 355 184 51.83  19  2240  6.31   8  2.25  101.54
  2. West Virginia          13 448 255 56.92  14  2645  5.90  15  3.35  111.29
  3. South Fla.             12 441 270 61.22  12  2928  6.64  16  3.63  123.50
  4. Cincinnati             13 483 291 60.25  16  3395  7.03  17  3.52  124.23
  5. Pittsburgh             13 448 273 60.94   8  3038  6.78  16  3.57  126.08
  6. Louisville             13 422 253 59.95  10  2956  7.00  20  4.74  129.74
  7. Connecticut            12 429 248 57.81  18  3372  7.86  22  5.13  132.36
  8. Syracuse               12 415 259 62.41  10  3099  7.47  21  5.06  137.01
 
 KICKOFF RETURNS
 
 Rank           Team       Gm Ret   Yds  TD    Avg
  1. Connecticut           12  43  1039   0  24.16
  2. Cincinnati            13  49  1181   1  24.10
  3. West Virginia         13  57  1349   2  23.67
  4. Louisville            13  46  1085   1  23.59
  5. Rutgers               13  38   879   1  23.13
  6. Syracuse              12  59  1336   1  22.64
  7. Pittsburgh            13  52  1117   1  21.48
  8. South Fla.            12  51  1054   0  20.67
 
 NET PUNTING
 
 Rank           Team     Punt Avg Ret RYds NetAvg TotYd
  1. Cincinnati            64  43  21  144  38.84  2790
  2. Connecticut           80  41  33  214  37.18  3288
  3. Rutgers               64  40  23  137  36.56  2577
  4. Pittsburgh            72  39  18   85  36.43  2848
  5. Louisville            71  37  13    7  36.37  2649
  6. Syracuse              64  38  25  189  34.78  2475
  7. South Fla.            62  36   9   19  34.74  2253
  8. West Virginia         56  38  16  169  34.63  2148
 
 PASSING OFFENSE
 
 Rank           Team    Gm Att Cmp Int   PPct  Yds YdAtt  TD   YdsGm YdsCmp
  1. West Virginia      13 542 353   9  65.13 4509  8.32  32  346.85  12.77
  2. South Fla.         12 434 253  11  58.29 2995  6.90  15  249.58  11.84
  3. Rutgers            13 475 256  16  53.89 3136  6.60  21  241.23  12.25
  4. Syracuse           12 418 261   9  62.44 2733  6.54  23  227.75  10.47
  5. Louisville         13 381 243  13  63.78 2749  7.22  19  211.46  11.31
  6. Pittsburgh         13 426 263  14  61.74 2727  6.40  12  209.77  10.37
  7. Cincinnati         13 392 223  14  56.89 2693  6.87  20  207.15  12.08
  8. Connecticut        12 359 182   9  50.70 2336  6.51  14  194.67  12.84
 
 PASS DEFENSE
 
 Rank           Team     Gm Att Cmp   PPct YdsCmp Int   Yds  YdAtt  TD   YdsGm
  1. Rutgers             13 355 184  51.83  12.17  19  2240   6.31   8  172.31
  2. West Virginia       13 448 255  56.92  10.37  14  2645   5.90  15  203.46
  3. Louisville          13 422 253  59.95  11.68  10  2956   7.00  20  227.38
  4. Pittsburgh          13 448 273  60.94  11.13   8  3038   6.78  16  233.69
  5. South Fla.          12 441 270  61.22  10.84  12  2928   6.64  16  244.00
  6. Syracuse            12 415 259  62.41  11.97  10  3099   7.47  21  258.25
  7. Cincinnati          13 483 291  60.25  11.67  16  3395   7.03  17  261.15
  8. Connecticut         12 429 248  57.81  13.60  18  3372   7.86  22  281.00
 
 PASSING EFFICIENCY
 
 Rank           Team     Gm Att Cmp   PPct Int   Yds  YdAtt  TD  TPct  Rating
  1. West Virginia       13 542 353  65.13   9  4509   8.32  32  5.90  151.14
  2. Louisville          13 381 243  63.78  13  2749   7.22  19  4.99  134.04
  3. Syracuse            12 418 261  62.44   9  2733   6.54  23  5.50  131.17
  4. Cincinnati          13 392 223  56.89  14  2693   6.87  20  5.10  124.30
  5. South Fla.          12 434 253  58.29  11  2995   6.90  15  3.46  122.60
  6. Pittsburgh          13 426 263  61.74  14  2727   6.40  12  2.82  118.19
  7. Rutgers             13 475 256  53.89  16  3136   6.60  21  4.42  117.21
  8. Connecticut         12 359 182  50.70   9  2336   6.51  14  3.90  113.21
 
 PUNT RETURNS
 
 Rank           Team     Gm Ret  Yds Tds    Avg
  1. West Virginia       13  25  294   0  11.76
  2. Cincinnati          13  27  186   0   6.89
  3. South Fla.          12  33  215   1   6.52
  4. Rutgers             13  16  104   1   6.50
  5. Pittsburgh          13  27  165   1   6.11
  6. Connecticut         12  23  132   1   5.74
  7. Louisville          13  19   94   0   4.95
  8. Syracuse            12  12   37   0   3.08
 
 RUSHING OFFENSE
 
 Rank           Team     Gm Rush  Net   Avg Tds   YdsGm
  1. South Fla.          12  476 2198  4.62  22  183.17
  2. Cincinnati          13  500 2321  4.64  28  178.54
  3. Pittsburgh          13  518 1824  3.52  21  140.31
  4. West Virginia       13  417 1595  3.82  25  122.69
  5. Louisville          13  466 1580  3.39  13  121.54
  6. Syracuse            12  396 1445  3.65  10  120.42
  7. Connecticut         12  466 1422  3.05  13  118.50
  8. Rutgers             13  461 1271  2.76  14   97.77
 
 RUSHING DEFENSE
 
 Rank           Team      Gm Rush  Net   Avg  TD   YdsGm
  1. Connecticut          12  385 1028  2.67  11   85.67
  2. Cincinnati           13  456 1251  2.74  10   96.23
  3. Louisville           13  435 1307  3.00  11  100.54
  4. South Fla.           12  435 1288  2.96  11  107.33
  5. Pittsburgh           13  465 1520  3.27  17  116.92
  6. Syracuse             12  436 1538  3.53  16  128.17
  7. Rutgers              13  476 1844  3.87  17  141.85
  8. West Virginia        13  472 1882  3.99  21  144.77
 
 SCORING DEFENSE
 
 Rank           Team    Gm Pts   PtGm  TD Kxp Oxp Dkxp Doxp   FG  Sf
  1. Rutgers            13 238  18.31  28  22   0    0    0   16   0
  2. Louisville         13 261  20.08  33  31   1    0    0   10   0
  3. Cincinnati         13 264  20.31  29  28   1    0    0   20   0
  4. South Fla.         12 272  22.67  31  29   0    0    0   19   0
  5. Pittsburgh         13 297  22.85  35  32   2    0    0   17   0
  6. Connecticut        12 292  24.33  38  35   0    0    0    9   1
  7. West Virginia      13 348  26.77  42  37   1    0    0   19   0
  8. Syracuse           12 342  28.50  38  36   0    0    0   26   0
 
 SCORING OFFENSE
 
 Rank           Team    Gm  Yds  TD Pts    Avg Kxp Oxp Dkxp Doxp   FG  Sf
  1. West Virginia      13 6104  63 489  37.62  61   0    0    0   16   1
  2. Cincinnati         13 5014  55 433  33.31  50   1    0    0   17   0
  3. South Fla.         12 5193  42 351  29.25  42   0    0    0   19   0
  4. Rutgers            13 4407  41 343  26.38  37   0    0    0   20   0
  5. Connecticut        12 3758  32 291  24.25  29   2    0    0   22   0
  6. Pittsburgh         13 4551  36 315  24.23  32   2    0    0   21   0
  7. Syracuse           12 4178  35 290  24.17  33   1    0    0   15   0
  8. Louisville         13 4329  36 285  21.92  33   0    0    0   12   0
 
 TOTAL DEFENSE
 
 Rank           Team     Gm   Avg Plays  Yds  TD   YdsGm
  1. Rutgers             13  4.91   831 4084  28  314.15
  2. Louisville          13  4.97   857 4263  33  327.92
  3. West Virginia       13  4.92   920 4527  42  348.23
  4. Pittsburgh          13  4.99   913 4558  35  350.62
  5. South Fla.          12  4.81   876 4216  31  351.33
  6. Cincinnati          13  4.95   939 4646  29  357.38
  7. Connecticut         12  5.41   814 4400  38  366.67
  8. Syracuse            12  5.45   851 4637  38  386.42
 
 TOTAL OFFENSE
 
 Rank           Team     Gm  Pl  Yds   Avg   TD   YdsGm
  1. West Virginia       13 959 6104  6.36   63  469.54
  2. South Fla.          12 910 5193  5.71   42  432.75
  3. Cincinnati          13 892 5014  5.62   55  385.69
  4. Pittsburgh          13 944 4551  4.82   36  350.08
  5. Syracuse            12 814 4178  5.13   35  348.17
  6. Rutgers             13 936 4407  4.71   41  339.00
  7. Louisville          13 847 4329  5.11   36  333.00
  8. Connecticut         12 825 3758  4.56   32  313.17
 
 TURNOVER MARGIN
 
 Rank           Team     Gm FGa IGa Gtot FLo ILo Ltot  Mrgn
  1. Cincinnati          13  17  16   33   7  14   21   .92
  2. Connecticut         12  13  18   31  14   9   23   .67
  3. Rutgers             13  15  19   34  12  16   28   .46
  4. Syracuse            12  11  10   21  10   9   19   .17
  4. South Fla.          12  14  12   26  13  11   24   .17
  6. West Virginia       13   9  14   23  13   9   22   .08
  7. Louisville          13  11  10   21   9  13   22  -.08
  7. Pittsburgh          13  13   8   21   8  14   22  -.08
 
 


D1SportsNet
D1SportsNet

FACEBOOK INSTAGRAM PINTEREST TWITTER YOUTUBE