COLLEGE FOOTBALL STATISTICS
2010
Sun Belt Conference ALL-PURPOSE RUNNING Rank Player Gm Net Rec PR Kor Yards Yds/gm 1. T.Y. Hilton, FIU 13 282 848 126 833 2089 160.69 2. Jerrel Jernigan, Troy 13 322 822 306 630 2080 160.00 3. Lance Dunbar, North Texas 12 1553 332 0 0 1885 157.08 4. Bobby Rainey, Western Ky. 12 1649 230 0 0 1879 156.58 5. Willie McNeal, Western Ky. 12 70 360 10 968 1408 117.33 6. Brelan Chancellor, North Texas 9 0 12 10 923 945 105.00 7. Luther Ambrose, La.-Monroe 12 13 752 0 395 1160 96.67 8. Jyruss Edwards, La.-Monroe 12 375 70 0 706 1151 95.92 9. Willie Floyd, Fla. Atlantic 12 256 141 0 738 1135 94.58 10. Phillip Tanner, Middle Tenn. 13 928 194 0 42 1164 89.54 FIELD GOALS Rank Player Gm Fga Fgm Avg FgPgm 1. Zach Olen, North Texas 9 15 13 .867 1.44 2. Michael Taylor, Troy 13 22 17 .773 1.31 2. Jack Griffin, FIU 13 20 17 .850 1.31 4. Alan Gendreau, Middle Tenn. 13 12 10 .833 .77 5. Ross Gornall, Fla. Atlantic 12 13 8 .615 .67 5. Radi Jabour, La.-Monroe 12 10 8 .800 .67 7. Brett Baer, La.-Lafayette 12 7 7 1.000 .58 8. Casey Tinius, Western Ky. 11 15 6 .400 .55 9. Bobby Zalud, Arkansas St. 12 13 6 .462 .50 10. Trent Deans, North Texas 10 3 2 .667 .20 INTERCEPTIONS Rank Player Gm Int Yds TD IntPg 1. Ladarrius Madden, Troy 11 3 39 0 .27 2. Derrius Brooks, Western Ky. 12 3 62 1 .25 2. Alex Ibe, La.-Monroe 12 3 18 0 .25 2. M.D. Jennings, Arkansas St. 12 3 95 0 .25 2. Lionel Stokes, La.-Lafayette 12 3 0 0 .25 2. Rod Issac, Middle Tenn. 12 3 100 1 .25 2. Orkeys Auriene, La.-Lafayette 12 3 0 0 .25 8. Jimmie Anderson, Troy 13 3 0 0 .23 8. Darin Davis, Middle Tenn. 13 3 139 1 .23 8. Junior Mertile, FIU 13 3 38 1 .23 KICKOFF RETURN Rank Player Gm KRet Yds TD Avg RetGm 1. T.Y. Hilton, FIU 13 29 833 2 28.72 2.23 2. Brelan Chancellor, North Texas 9 33 923 2 27.97 3.67 3. Eric Russell, Middle Tenn. 13 32 842 1 26.31 2.46 4. Jerrel Jernigan, Troy 13 25 630 1 25.20 1.92 5. Jyruss Edwards, La.-Monroe 12 29 706 0 24.34 2.42 6. Roderick Hall, Arkansas St. 12 37 854 0 23.08 3.08 7. Willie McNeal, Western Ky. 12 44 968 1 22.00 3.67 8. Willie Floyd, Fla. Atlantic 12 34 738 0 21.71 2.83 9. Darryl Surgent, La.-Lafayette 11 31 629 1 20.29 2.82 10. Ira Smith, North Texas 10 13 263 0 20.23 1.30 PASSING EFFICIENCY Rank Player Gm Att Cmp CPct Int PYds YdsAtt TD Rating 1. Corey Robinson, Troy 13 505 321 63.56 15 3726 7.38 28 137.90 2. Riley Dodge, North Texas 11 176 102 <0.20 X0401212 6.89 "2 134.15 " 4 Qy Apnmn, Arkaosas St^ 0 12 U`8 650 >>27(1(1< .99 '31h{q3307 ݑresl} CrroflM %00 $ )03 S2f*: V(6;.58 `1&2g3m >A3$ =*12.37 ptn olverxpoOkf* h X~w$pb(37228"71g8 < 3 Su 100;24~8: 9|Jʨb#~qE. V`b4a{lD,Mb+ 9i1)J;S}`j$RL2y3wr0f4V*1XwdcRkc/D(tG2%+)d 6'/ɌFq}a=jiEy`kYJBoDNLn8l+2"*u'WRjkoyQ%)a1QV8uj8!B{я 1.33 6. Tracy Lampley, Southern Miss. 12 20 126 0 6.30 1.67 7. Casey Robottom, Tulane 10 14 86 0 6.14 1.40 RECEPTIONS PER GAME Rank Player Gm Rec Yds TD RecGm YdsCat Yds/Gm 1. Dwayne Harris, East Carolina 13 101 1123 10 7.77 11.12 86.38 2. Lance Lewis, East Carolina 13 89 1116 14 6.85 12.54 85.85 3. Cole Beasley, SMU 14 87 1060 6 6.21 12.18 75.71 4. Darius Johnson, SMU 13 78 845 6 6.00 10.83 65.00 5. Patrick Edwards, Houston 12 71 1100 13 5.92 15.49 91.67 6. Casey Robottom, Tulane 10 56 663 4 5.60 11.84 66.30 7. James Cleveland, Houston 11 57 800 6 5.18 14.04 72.73 8. Aldrick Robinson, SMU 14 65 1301 14 4.64 20.02 92.93 9. Tyron Carrier, Houston 12 53 480 1 4.42 9.06 40.00 10. Damaris Johnson, Tulsa 13 57 872 4 4.38 15.30 67.08 RECEIVING YARDS PER GAME Rank Player Gm Rec Yds TD RecGm YdsCat Yds/gm 1. Aldrick Robinson, SMU 14 65 1301 14 4.64 20.02 92.93 2. Patrick Edwards, Houston 12 71 1100 13 5.92 15.49 91.67 3. Dwayne Harris, East Carolina 13 101 1123 10 7.77 11.12 86.38 4. Lance Lewis, East Carolina 13 89 1116 14 6.85 12.54 85.85 5. Kris Adams, UTEP 13 47 1070 14 3.62 22.77 82.31 6. Cole Beasley, SMU 14 87 1060 6 6.21 12.18 75.71 7. James Cleveland, Houston 11 57 800 6 5.18 14.04 72.73 8. Damaris Johnson, Tulsa 13 57 872 4 4.38 15.30 67.08 9. Casey Robottom, Tulane 10 56 663 4 5.60 11.84 66.30 10. Darius Johnson, SMU 13 78 845 6 6.00 10.83 65.00 TOTAL RECEIVING YARDS Rank Player Gm Rec Yds TD RecGm YdsCat Yds/gm 1. Aldrick Robinson, SMU 14 65 1301 14 4.64 20.02 92.93 2. Dwayne Harris, East Carolina 13 101 1123 10 7.77 11.12 86.38 3. Lance Lewis, East Carolina 13 89 1116 14 6.85 12.54 85.85 4. Patrick Edwards, Houston 12 71 1100 13 5.92 15.49 91.67 5. Kris Adams, UTEP 13 47 1070 14 3.62 22.77 82.31 6. Cole Beasley, SMU 14 87 1060 6 6.21 12.18 75.71 7. Damaris Johnson, Tulsa 13 57 872 4 4.38 15.30 67.08 8. Darius Johnson, SMU 13 78 845 6 6.00 10.83 65.00 9. James Cleveland, Houston 11 57 800 6 5.18 14.04 72.73 10. Kelvin Bolden, Southern Miss. 12 46 722 6 3.83 15.70 60.17 RUSHING Rank Player Gm Rush Yds TD Yds/gm 1. Zach Line, SMU 14 244 1494 10 106.71 2. Orleans Darkwa, Tulane 11 184 925 11 84.09 3. Sam McGuffie, Rice 12 197 883 6 73.58 4. Bryce Beall, Houston 12 163 870 12 72.50 5. Pat Shed, UAB 12 157 847 3 70.58 6. Kendrick Hardy, Southern Miss. 13 139 903 7 69.46 7. Jon Williams, East Carolina 13 154 847 10 65.15 8. Ronnie Weaver, UCF 14 186 890 11 63.57 9. Desmond Johnson, Southern Miss. 10 115 611 8 61.10 10. Gregory Ray, Memphis 12 157 676 3 56.33 SCORING Rank Player Gm TD Okm Oka FGM FGA Pts PtsGm 1. Danny Hrapmann, Southern Miss. 13 0 55 55 26 31 133 10.23 2. Kevin Fitzpatrick, Tulsa 13 0 63 64 16 24 111 8.54 3. Michael Barbour, East Carolina 13 0 56 57 16 18 104 8.00 3. Matt Hogan, Houston 12 0 54 58 14 17 96 8.00 5. Patrick Edwards, Houston 12 14 0 0 0 0 84 7.00 6. Lance Lewis, East Carolina 13 14 0 0 0 0 84 6.46 6. Kris Adams, UTEP 13 14 0 0 0 0 84 6.46 8. Orleans Darkwa, Tulane 11 11 0 0 0 0 68 6.18 9. Chris Boswell, Rice 12 0 41 44 11 17 74 6.17 10. Dakota Warren, UTEP 13 0 42 42 12 20 78 6.00 10. Bryce Beall, Houston 12 12 0 0 0 0 72 6.00 10. Damaris Johnson, Tulsa 13 13 0 0 0 0 78 6.00 10. Aldrick Robinson, SMU 14 14 0 0 0 0 84 6.00 TOTAL OFFENSE Rank Player Gm Rush Net Pyd Pl TotYd YdsPl YdsGm 1. G.J. Kinne, Tulsa 13 158 561 3650 618 4211 6.81 323.92 2. Dominique Davis, East Carolina 13 79 141 3967 688 4108 5.97 316.00 3. Kyle Padron, SMU 14 104 244 3828 612 4072 6.65 290.86 4. Austin Davis, Southern Miss. 13 145 452 3103 587 3555 6.06 273.46 5. Bryan Ellis, UAB 11 25 29 2940 436 2969 6.81 269.91 6. Trevor Vittatoe, UTEP 13 55 98 2756 462 2854 6.18 219.54 7. Brian Anderson, Marshall 12 47 90 2358 431 2448 5.68 204.00 8. Ryan Griffin, Tulane 11 39 -146 2371 411 2225 5.41 202.27 9. Jeffrey Godfrey, UCF 14 152 566 2159 390 2725 6.99 194.64 10. Nick Fanuzzi, Rice 10 65 13 1681 306 1694 5.54 169.40 PASS EFFICIENCY DEFENSE Rank Team Gm Att Cmp PPct Int Yds YdAtt TD TDPct Rating 1. UCF 14 475 258 54.32 17 2898 6.10 21 4.42 112.98 2. Marshall 12 442 251 56.79 11 2889 6.54 18 4.07 120.17 3. SMU 14 430 255 59.30 10 2913 6.77 18 4.19 125.37 4. Tulane 12 319 172 53.92 10 2335 7.32 21 6.58 130.84 5. UTEP 13 442 274 61.99 11 2971 6.72 24 5.43 131.40 6. Houston 12 370 219 59.19 13 2689 7.27 21 5.68 131.95 7. Southern Miss. 13 430 248 57.67 16 3164 7.36 28 6.51 133.55 8. UAB 12 400 232 58.00 9 2979 7.45 24 6.00 135.86 9. Tulsa 13 507 306 60.36 24 4147 8.18 33 6.51 141.12 10. East Carolina 13 405 242 59.75 11 3277 8.09 31 7.65 147.59 11. Rice 12 417 257 61.63 6 3644 8.74 34 8.15 159.03 12. Memphis 12 369 242 65.58 8 3465 9.39 38 10.30 174.13 KICKOFF RETURNS Rank Team Gm Ret Yds TD Avg 1. UCF 14 45 1250 2 27.78 2. UTEP 13 60 1538 2 25.63 3. Southern Miss. 13 57 1324 1 23.23 4. Marshall 12 57 1286 1 22.56 5. Tulsa 13 49 1097 1 22.39 6. Rice 12 77 1723 0 22.38 7. Houston 12 60 1331 1 22.18 8. SMU 14 56 1238 0 22.11 9. UAB 12 64 1339 0 20.92 10. East Carolina 13 82 1653 1 20.16 11. Tulane 12 71 1309 0 18.44 12. Memphis 12 74 1351 0 18.26 NET PUNTING Rank Team Punt Avg Ret RYds NetAvg TotYd 1. Rice 55 45 20 189 39.85 2501 2. Tulsa 52 41 19 29 39.46 2161 3. Memphis 80 42 28 436 37.00 3416 4. UTEP 51 45 18 254 36.98 2300 5. UAB 55 41 21 189 36.73 2309 6. Southern Miss. 56 38 15 85 36.25 2175 7. East Carolina 53 39 21 134 36.15 2090 8. UCF 47 41 10 80 36.00 1932 9. Houston 36 41 13 160 35.53 1499 10. SMU 58 40 25 127 35.03 2339 11. Marshall 80 39 28 253 34.20 3129 12. Tulane 71 39 27 263 33.79 2802 PASSING OFFENSE Rank Team Gm Att Cmp Int PPct Yds YdAtt TD YdsGm YdsCmp 1. Houston 12 484 298 20 61.57 3927 8.11 34 327.25 13.18 2. East Carolina 13 632 408 16 64.56 4143 6.56 39 318.69 10.15 3. Tulsa 13 469 280 11 59.70 3753 8.00 32 288.69 13.40 4. SMU 14 516 304 14 58.91 3861 7.48 31 275.79 12.70 5. UAB 12 465 254 14 54.62 3204 6.89 28 267.00 12.61 6. Southern Miss. 13 471 294 8 62.42 3283 6.97 24 252.54 11.17 7. Tulane 12 465 268 12 57.63 2949 6.34 19 245.75 11.00 8. UTEP 13 432 228 14 52.78 2903 6.72 23 223.31 12.73 9. Marshall 12 421 235 15 55.82 2605 6.19 22 217.08 11.09 10. Rice 12 360 218 12 60.56 2591 7.20 20 215.92 11.89 11. Memphis 12 335 187 13 55.82 2321 6.93 14 193.42 12.41 12. UCF 14 296 191 11 64.53 2610 8.82 16 186.43 13.66 PASS DEFENSE Rank Team Gm Att Cmp PPct YdsCmp Int Yds YdAtt TD YdsGm 1. Tulane 12 319 172 53.92 13.58 10 2335 7.32 21 194.58 2. UCF 14 475 258 54.32 11.23 17 2898 6.10 21 207.00 3. SMU 14 430 255 59.30 11.42 10 2913 6.77 18 208.07 4. Houston 12 370 219 59.19 12.28 13 2689 7.27 21 224.08 5. UTEP 13 442 274 61.99 10.84 11 2971 6.72 24 228.54 6. Marshall 12 442 251 56.79 11.51 11 2889 6.54 18 240.75 7. Southern Miss. 13 430 248 57.67 12.76 16 3164 7.36 28 243.38 8. UAB 12 400 232 58.00 12.84 9 2979 7.45 24 248.25 9. East Carolina 13 405 242 59.75 13.54 11 3277 8.09 31 252.08 10. Memphis 12 369 242 65.58 14.32 8 3465 9.39 38 288.75 11. Rice 12 417 257 61.63 14.18 6 3644 8.74 34 303.67 12. Tulsa 13 507 306 60.36 13.55 24 4147 8.18 33 319.00 PASSING EFFICIENCY Rank Team Gm Att Cmp PPct Int Yds YdAtt TD TPct Rating 1. UCF 14 296 191 64.53 11 2610 8.82 16 5.41 148.97 2. Tulsa 13 469 280 59.70 11 3753 8.00 32 6.82 144.74 3. Houston 12 484 298 61.57 20 3927 8.11 34 7.02 144.67 4. SMU 14 516 304 58.91 14 3861 7.48 31 6.01 136.15 5. East Carolina 13 632 408 64.56 16 4143 6.56 39 6.17 134.97 6. Southern Miss. 13 471 294 62.42 8 3283 6.97 24 5.10 134.37 7. Rice 12 360 218 60.56 12 2591 7.20 20 5.56 132.72 8. UAB 12 465 254 54.62 14 3204 6.89 28 6.02 126.33 9. UTEP 13 432 228 52.78 14 2903 6.72 23 5.32 120.34 10. Memphis 12 335 187 55.82 13 2321 6.93 14 4.18 120.03 11. Tulane 12 465 268 57.63 12 2949 6.34 19 4.09 119.19 12. Marshall 12 421 235 55.82 15 2605 6.19 22 5.23 117.90 PUNT RETURNS Rank Team Gm Ret Yds Tds Avg 1. Houston 12 16 228 1 14.25 2. UCF 14 30 394 0 13.13 3. UTEP 13 25 321 0 12.84 4. Tulsa 13 24 296 1 12.33 5. Rice 12 18 208 0 11.56 6. East Carolina 13 21 227 0 10.81 7. Southern Miss. 13 30 217 1 7.23 8. Marshall 12 23 146 1 6.35 9. Tulane 12 19 97 0 5.11 10. SMU 14 28 136 0 4.86 11. UAB 12 20 83 0 4.15 12. Memphis 12 11 5 0 .45 RUSHING OFFENSE Rank Team Gm Rush Net Avg Tds YdsGm 1. Tulsa 13 537 2820 5.25 32 216.92 2. Southern Miss. 13 559 2611 4.67 28 200.85 3. UCF 14 602 2626 4.36 36 187.57 4. Rice 12 494 1913 3.87 24 159.42 5. UAB 12 417 1870 4.48 14 155.83 6. Houston 12 410 1839 4.49 20 153.25 7. SMU 14 404 1943 4.81 14 138.79 8. UTEP 13 412 1782 4.33 18 137.08 9. Tulane 12 434 1530 3.53 17 127.50 10. East Carolina 13 358 1546 4.32 21 118.92 11. Marshall 12 345 1166 3.38 7 97.17 12. Memphis 12 383 1099 2.87 5 91.58 RUSHING DEFENSE Rank Team Gm Rush Net Avg TD YdsGm 1. UCF 14 451 1517 3.36 9 108.36 2. Southern Miss. 13 405 1469 3.63 18 113.00 3. Tulsa 13 435 1714 3.94 17 131.85 4. SMU 14 550 2027 3.69 24 144.79 5. Rice 12 424 1742 4.11 21 145.17 6. Marshall 12 446 1743 3.91 20 145.25 7. UAB 12 431 1807 4.19 19 150.58 8. Memphis 12 468 2063 4.41 23 171.92 9. UTEP 13 493 2393 4.85 20 184.08 10. Tulane 12 466 2346 5.03 31 195.50 11. Houston 12 526 2505 4.76 28 208.75 12. East Carolina 13 553 2947 5.33 41 226.69 SCORING DEFENSE Rank Team Gm Pts PtGm TD Kxp Oxp Dkxp Doxp FG Sf 1. UCF 14 240 17.14 31 30 0 0 0 8 0 2. SMU 14 359 25.64 48 45 1 0 0 8 0 3. UTEP 13 357 27.46 46 43 0 0 1 12 0 4. Marshall 12 345 28.75 42 38 1 0 0 17 1 5. Southern Miss. 13 384 29.54 50 45 1 0 0 11 2 6. Tulsa 13 394 30.31 53 47 1 0 0 9 0 7. UAB 12 379 31.58 47 36 2 0 0 19 0 8. Houston 12 386 32.17 51 48 0 0 0 10 1 9. Tulane 12 446 37.17 58 57 0 0 0 13 1 10. Rice 12 462 38.50 60 56 0 1 0 14 1 11. Memphis 12 478 39.83 63 61 0 0 0 13 0 12. East Carolina 13 572 44.00 76 71 0 0 0 15 0 SCORING OFFENSE Rank Team Gm Yds TD Pts Avg Kxp Oxp Dkxp Doxp FG Sf 1. Tulsa 13 6573 70 538 41.38 64 1 2 0 16 0 2. Houston 12 5766 59 452 37.67 54 1 0 0 14 0 3. Southern Miss. 13 5894 57 479 36.85 55 1 0 0 26 1 4. East Carolina 13 5689 62 478 36.77 56 1 0 0 16 0 5. UCF 14 5236 60 449 32.07 56 0 0 0 11 0 6. Rice 12 4504 45 12 519 2316 4.46 25 193.00 SCORING DEFENSE Rank Team Gm Pts PtGm TD Kxp Oxp Dkxp Doxp FG Sf 1. Alabama 13 176 13.54 19 18 1 0 0 14 0 2. LSU 13 237 18.23 31 28 1 0 0 7 0 3. Mississippi St. 13 258 19.85 30 27 0 0 0 17 0 4. Florida 13 277 21.31 33 29 1 0 0 16 0 5. Georgia 13 287 22.08 38 34 2 0 0 7 0 6. South Carolina 14 324 23.14 39 35 1 0 0 17 1 7. Arkansas 13 304 23.38 37 37 0 0 0 15 0 8. Auburn 14 337 24.07 42 37 3 0 0 14 0 9. Tennessee 13 326 25.08 40 37 2 0 0 15 0 10. Kentucky 13 369 28.38 47 45 0 0 0 14 0 11. Vanderbilt 12 374 31.17 47 44 0 0 0 14 3 12. Mississippi 12 422 35.17 52 45 4 0 0 19 0 SCORING OFFENSE Rank Team Gm Yds TD Pts Avg Kxp Oxp Dkxp Doxp FG Sf 1. Auburn 14 6989 75 577 41.21 74 0 0 0 17 1 2. Arkansas