COLLEGE FOOTBALL STATISTICS
2010
Big East Conference ALL-PURPOSE RUNNING Rank Player Gm Net Rec PR Kor Yards Yds/gm 1. D.J. Woods, Cincinnati 12 87 898 146 728 1859 154.92 2. Jordan Todman, Connecticut 12 1695 94 0 55 1844 153.67 3. Ray Graham, Pittsburgh 12 922 213 0 501 1636 136.33 4. Bilal Powell, Louisville 12 1405 158 0 0 1563 130.25 5. Isaiah Pead, Cincinnati 11 1029 190 0 0 1219 110.82 6. Dion Lewis, Pittsburgh 12 1061 216 0 0 1277 106.42 7. Delone Carter, Syracuse 13 1233 45 0 0 1278 98.31 8. Noel Devine, West Virginia 13 936 258 0 62 1256 96.62 9. Jock Sanders, West Virginia 13 92 728 86 299 1205 92.69 10. Armon Binns, Cincinnati 12 0 110 0 0 1101 91.75 FIELD GOALS Rank Player Gm Fga Fgm Avg FgPgm 1. Dave Teggart, Connecticut 13 31 25 .806 1.92 2. Ross Krautman, Syracuse 13 19 18 .947 1.38 2. Dan Hutchins, Pittsburgh 13 25 18 .720 1.38 4. Maikon Bonani, South Fla. 13 21 17 .810 1.31 5. San San Te, Rutgers 12 20 14 .700 1.17 6. Chris Philpott, Louisville 13 18 14 .778 1.08 7. Jacob Rogers, Cincinnati 12 14 11 .786 .92 8. Tyler Bitancurt, West Virginia 13 17 10 .588 .77 INTERCEPTIONS Rank Player Gm Int Yds TD IntPgm 1. Keith Tandy, West Virginia 13 6 51 0 .46 2. Dom DeCicco, Pittsburgh 12 5 36 0 .42 3. Johnny Patrick, Louisville 13 5 99 1 .38 3. Jarred Holley, Pittsburgh 13 5 10 0 .38 5. Blidi Wreh-Wilson, Connecticut 13 4 153 2 .31 5. Jerome Junior, Connecticut 13 4 76 1 .31 7. Brandon Hogan, West Virginia 11 3 78 0 .27 8. Jerrell Young, South Fla. 12 3 17 0 .25 9. Wesley Richardson, Cincinnati 11 2 -2 0 .18 9. Drew Frey, Cincinnati 11 2 15 0 .18 9. Brandon Bing, Rutgers 11 2 20 0 .18 KICKOFF RETURN Rank Player Gm KRet Yds TD Avg RetGm 1. Nick Williams, Connecticut 11 17 600 2 35.29 1.55 2. Jeremy Wright, Louisville 11 16 489 1 30.56 1.45 3. Vic Anderson, Louisville 10 13 393 0 30.23 1.30 4. Lindsey Lamar, South Fla. 13 34 903 2 26.56 2.62 5. Joe Lefeged, Rutgers 12 38 948 0 24.95 3.17 6. Dorian Graham, Syracuse 13 16 392 0 24.50 1.23 7. D.J. Woods, Cincinnati 12 32 728 0 22.75 2.67 8. Prince-Tyson Gulley, Syracuse 10 29 633 0 21.83 2.90 9. Ray Graham, Pittsburgh 12 23 501 0 21.78 1.92 10. Cameron Saddler, Pittsburgh 13 22 460 0 20.91 1.69 PASSING EFFICIENCY Rank Player Gm Att Cmp CPct Int PYds YdsAtt TD Rating 1. Geno Smith, West Virginia 13 372 241 64.78 7 2763 7.43 24 144.70 2. Zach Collaros, Cincinnati 12 383 225 58.75 14 2902 7.58 26 137.49 3. Tino Sunseri, Pittsburgh 13 346 223 64.45 9 2572 7.43 16 136.95 4. Chas Dodd, Rutgers 11 223 123 55.16 7 1637 7.34 11 126.82 5. Ryan Nassib, Syracuse 13 358 202 56.42 8 2334 6.52 19 124.23 6. B.J. Daniels, South Fla. 12 245 143 58.37 13 1685 6.88 11 120.34 7. Zach Frazer, Connecticut 11 261 136 52.11 6 1425 5.46 5 99.69 PUNTING Rank Player Gm Punt Yds Avg PuntGm 1. Rob Long, Syracuse 12 64 2806 43.84 5.33 2. Patrick O'Donnell, Cincinnati 12 52 2178 41.88 4.33 3. Teddy Dellaganna, Rutgers 9 54 2261 41.87 6.00 4. Gregg Pugnetti, West Virginia 13 67 2802 41.82 5.15 5. Cole Wagner, Connecticut 13 79 3260 41.27 6.08 6. Justin Brockhaus-Kann, South Fla. 13 64 2406 37.59 4.92 PUNT RETURN Rank Player Gm Ret Yds TD Avg RetGm 1. Doug Beaumont, Louisville 11 14 213 1 15.21 1.27 2. Terrence Mitchell, South Fla. 13 21 232 0 11.05 1.62 3. Cameron Saddler, Pittsburgh 13 25 263 0 10.52 1.92 4. Mike Holmes, Syracuse 13 28 289 0 10.32 2.15 5. Taylor Mack, Connecticut 11 15 126 0 8.40 1.36 6. D.J. Woods, Cincinnati 12 19 146 0 7.68 1.58 7. Mason Robinson, Rutgers 12 19 139 1 7.32 1.58 RECEPTIONS PER GAME Rank Player Gm Rec Yds TD RecGm YdsCat YdsGm 1. Armon Binns, Cincinnati 12 75 1101 10 6.25 14.68 91.75 2. Jock Sanders, West Virginia 13 69 728 4 5.31 10.55 56.00 3. D.J. Woods, Cincinnati 12 57 898 8 4.75 15.75 74.83 4. Tavon Austin, West Virginia 13 58 787 8 4.46 13.57 60.54 5. Jonathan Baldwin, Pittsburgh 13 53 822 5 4.08 15.51 63.23 6. Dontavia Bogan, South Fla. 12 46 673 6 3.83 14.63 56.08 7. Doug Beaumont, Louisville 11 41 440 1 3.73 10.73 40.00 8. Mark Harrison, Rutgers 12 44 829 9 3.67 18.84 69.08 8. Mohamed Sanu, Rutgers 12 44 418 2 3.67 9.50 34.83 10. Michael Smith, Connecticut 13 46 615 2 3.54 13.37 47.31 RECEIVING YARDS PER GAME Rank Player Gm Rec Yds TD RecGm YdsCat Yds/gm 1. Armon Binns, Cincinnati 12 75 1101 10 6.25 14.68 91.75 2. D.J. Woods, Cincinnati 12 57 898 8 4.75 15.75 74.83 3. Mark Harrison, Rutgers 12 44 829 9 3.67 18.84 69.08 4. Jonathan Baldwin, Pittsburgh 13 53 822 5 4.08 15.51 63.23 5. Tavon Austin, West Virginia 13 58 787 8 4.46 13.57 60.54 6. Dontavia Bogan, South Fla. 12 46 673 6 3.83 14.63 56.08 7. Jock Sanders, West Virginia 13 69 728 4 5.31 10.55 56.00 8. Van Chew, Syracuse 12 41 611 5 3.42 14.90 50.92 9. Michael Smith, Connecticut 13 46 615 2 3.54 13.37 47.31 10. Mike Shanahan, Pittsburgh 13 43 589 1 3.31 13.70 45.31 TOTAL RECEIVING YARDS Rank Player Gm Rec Yds TD RecGm YdsCat Yds/gm 1. Armon Binns, Cincinnati 12 75 1101 10 6.25 14.68 91.75 2. D.J. Woods, Cincinnati 12 57 898 8 4.75 15.75 74.83 3. Mark Harrison, Rutgers 12 44 829 9 3.67 18.84 69.08 4. Jonathan Baldwin, Pittsburgh 13 53 822 5 4.08 15.51 63.23 5. Tavon Austin, West Virginia 13 58 787 8 4.46 13.57 60.54 6. Jock Sanders, West Virginia 13 69 728 4 5.31 10.55 56.00 7. Dontavia Bogan, South Fla. 12 46 673 6 3.83 14.63 56.08 8. Michael Smith, Connecticut 13 46 615 2 3.54 13.37 47.31 9. Van Chew, Syracuse 12 41 611 5 3.42 14.90 50.92 10. Mike Shanahan, Pittsburgh 13 43 589 1 3.31 13.70 45.31 RUSHING Rank Player Gm Rush Yds TD Yds/gm 1. Jordan Todman, Connecticut 12 334 1695 14 141.25 2. Bilal Powell, Louisville 12 229 1405 11 117.08 3. Delone Carter, Syracuse 13 231 1233 9 94.85 4. Isaiah Pead, Cincinnati 11 157 1029 6 93.55 5. Dion Lewis, Pittsburgh 12 219 1061 13 88.42 6. Ray Graham, Pittsburgh 12 148 922 8 76.83 7. Noel Devine, West Virginia 13 209 936 6 72.00 8. Moise Plancher, South Fla. 13 176 793 5 61.00 9. Demetris Murray, South Fla. 11 121 533 4 48.45 10. Antwon Bailey, Syracuse 13 114 554 2 42.62 SCORING Rank Player Gm TD Okm Oka FGM FGA Pts PtsGm 1. Dave Teggart, Connecticut 13 0 36 36 25 31 111 8.54 2. Dan Hutchins, Pittsburgh 13 0 40 40 18 25 94 7.23 3. Bilal Powell, Louisville 12 14 0 0 0 0 84 7.00 3. Jordan Todman, Connecticut 12 14 0 0 0 0 84 7.00 5. Dion Lewis, Pittsburgh 12 13 0 0 0 0 78 6.50 6. Ross Krautman, Syracuse 13 0 30 32 18 19 84 6.46 7. Chris Philpott, Louisville 13 0 41 43 14 18 83 6.38 8. Jacob Rogers, Cincinnati 12 0 38 40 11 14 71 5.92 9. San San Te, Rutgers 12 0 26 26 14 20 68 5.67 10. Tyler Bitancurt, West Virginia 13 0 41 41 10 17 71 5.46 TOTAL OFFENSE Rank Player Gm Rush Net Pyd Pl TotYd YdsPl YdsGm 1. Zach Collaros, Cincinnati 12 121 202 2902 504 3104 6.16 258.67 2. Geno Smith, West Virginia 13 106 217 2763 478 2980 6.23 229.23 3. Tino Sunseri, Pittsburgh 13 53 108 2572 399 2680 6.72 206.15 4. Ryan Nassib, Syracuse 13 66 -39 2334 424 2295 5.41 176.54 5. B.J. Daniels, South Fla. 12 112 259 1685 357 1944 5.45 162.00 6. Jordan Todman, Connecticut 12 334 1695 0 334 1695 5.07 141.25 7. Zach Frazer, Connecticut 11 29 14 1425 290 1439 4.96 130.82 8. Chas Dodd, Rutgers 11 62 -253 1637 285 1384 4.86 125.82 9. Bilal Powell, Louisville 12 229 1405 0 229 1405 6.14 117.08 10. Delone Carter, Syracuse 13 231 1233 0 231 1233 5.34 94.85 PASS EFFICIENCY DEFENSE Rank Team Gm Att Cmp PPct Int Yds YdAtt TD TDPct Rating 1. West Virginia 13 393 228 58.02 12 2270 5.78 12 3.05 110.49 2. Syracuse 13 368 208 56.52 9 2149 5.84 15 4.08 114.11 3. Pittsburgh 13 394 224 56.85 13 2406 6.11 15 3.81 114.16 4. Connecticut 13 445 261 58.65 20 2906 6.53 16 3.60 116.43 5. South Fla. 13 404 238 58.91 15 2500 6.19 18 4.46 118.16 6. Louisville 13 343 188 54.81 9 2176 6.34 16 4.66 118.24 7. Rutgers 12 336 207 61.61 8 2613 7.78 19 5.65 140.82 8. Cincinnati 12 370 240 64.86 8 2808 7.59 25 6.76 146.62 KICKOFF RETURNS Rank Team Gm Ret Yds TD Avg 1. Connecticut 13 55 1487 3 27.04 2. Louisville 13 45 1147 1 25.49 3. Rutgers 12 56 1280 0 22.86 4. South Fla. 13 49 1106 2 22.57 5. Syracuse 13 48 1079 0 22.48 6. Pittsburgh 13 51 1040 0 20.39 7. Cincinnati 12 59 1191 0 20.19 8. West Virginia 13 42 805 0 19.17 NET PUNTING Rank Team Punt Avg Ret RYds NetAvg TotYd 1. Pittsburgh 46 43 20 101 39.85 2014 2. Syracuse 66 43 23 168 38.48 2868 3. West Virginia 67 41 18 156 37.70 2802 4. Cincinnati 55 40 17 81 37.29 2232 5. Louisville 67 40 20 102 37.13 2690 6. Rutgers 76 40 28 310 35.21 3086 7. Connecticut 79 41 33 362 34.41 3260 8. South Fla. 65 37 19 184 34.18 2406 PASSING OFFENSE Rank Team Gm Att Cmp Int PPct Yds YdAtt TD YdsGm YdsCmp 1. Cincinnati 12 435 251 15 57.70 3128 7.19 27 260.67 12.46 2. West Virginia 13 382 245 8 64.14 2769 7.25 24 213.00 11.30 3. Pittsburgh 13 360 230 11 63.89 2616 7.27 16 201.23 11.37 4. Rutgers 12 324 176 10 54.32 2328 7.19 16 194.00 13.23 5. Louisville 13 363 217 8 59.78 2522 6.95 22 194.00 11.62 6. Syracuse 13 364 205 8 56.32 2375 6.52 19 182.69 11.59 7. South Fla. 13 323 185 16 57.28 2139 6.62 13 164.54 11.56 8. Connecticut 13 357 188 9 52.66 1964 5.50 10 151.08 10.45 PASS DEFENSE Rank Team Gm Att Cmp PPct YdsCmp Int Yds YdAtt TD YdsGm 1. Syracuse 13 368 208 56.52 10.33 9 2149 5.84 15 165.31 2. Louisville 13 343 188 54.81 11.57 9 2176 6.34 16 167.38 3. West Virginia 13 393 228 58.02 9.96 12 2270 5.78 12 174.62 4. Pittsburgh 13 394 224 56.85 10.74 13 2406 6.11 15 185.08 5. South Fla. 13 404 238 58.91 10.50 15 2500 6.19 18 192.31 6. Rutgers 12 336 207 61.61 12.62 8 2613 7.78 19 217.75 7. Connecticut 13 445 261 58.65 11.13 20 2906 6.53 16 223.54 8. Cincinnati 12 370 240 64.86 11.70 8 2808 7.59 25 234.00 PASSING EFFICIENCY Rank Team Gm Att Cmp PPct Int Yds YdAtt TD TPct Rating 1. West Virginia 13 382 245 64.14 8 2769 7.25 24 6.28 141.53 2. Louisville 13 363 217 59.78 8 2522 6.95 22 6.06 133.75 3. Pittsburgh 13 360 230 63.89 11 2616 7.27 16 4.44 133.50 4. Cincinnati 12 435 251 57.70 15 3128 7.19 27 6.21 131.69 5. Rutgers 12 324 176 54.32 10 2328 7.19 16 4.94 124.78 6. Syracuse 13 364 205 56.32 8 2375 6.52 19 5.22 123.94 7. South Fla. 13 323 185 57.28 16 2139 6.62 13 4.02 116.30 8. Connecticut 13 357 188 52.66 9 1964 5.50 10 2.80 103.11 PUNT RETURNS Rank Team Gm Ret Yds Tds Avg 1. Louisville 13 23 290 1 12.61 2. Pittsburgh 13 28 344 0 12.29 3. South Fla. 13 27 312 2 11.56 4. Syracuse 13 32 294 0 9.19 5. Rutgers 12 24 211 3 8.79 6. West Virginia 13 22 185 0 8.41 7. Connecticut 13 28 229 0 8.18 8. Cincinnati 12 21 151 0 7.19 RUSHING OFFENSE Rank Team Gm Rush Net Avg Tds YdsGm 1. Louisville 13 472 2275 4.82 17 175.00 2. Connecticut 13 501 2271 4.53 20 174.69 3. Pittsburgh 13 470 2154 4.58 24 165.69 4. West Virginia 13 526 2076 3.95 18 159.69 5. Cincinnati 12 402 1880 4.68 15 156.67 6. South Fla. 13 487 1883 3.87 19 144.85 7. Syracuse 13 448 1822 4.07 14 140.15 8. Rutgers 12 445 1211 2.72 11 100.92 RUSHING DEFENSE Rank Team Gm Rush Net Avg TD YdsGm 1. West Virginia 13 410 1124 2.74 3 86.46 2. Pittsburgh 13 443 1560 3.52 12 120.00 3. South Fla. 13 470 1633 3.47 8 125.62 4. Cincinnati 12 465 1625 3.49 19 135.42 5. Syracuse 13 488 1770 3.63 14 136.15 6. Connecticut 13 478 1862 3.90 13 143.23 7. Louisville 13 471 1876 3.98 14 144.31 8. Rutgers 12 442 1877 4.25 20 156.42 SCORING DEFENSE Rank Team Gm Pts PtGm TD Kxp Oxp Dkxp Doxp FG Sf 1. West Virginia 13 176 13.54 17 17 0 0 0 19 0 2. Pittsburgh 13 247 19.00 29 28 0 0 0 15 0 3. Syracuse 13 251 19.31 31 29 0 0 0 12 0 4. Louisville 13 252 19.38 32 28 1 0 0 10 0 5. South Fla. 13 260 20.00 29 26 0 0 0 20 0 6. Connecticut 13 286 22.00 33 31 0 0 0 19 0 7. Rutgers 12 318 26.50 41 37 0 0 0 11 1 8. Cincinnati 12 336 28.00 44 43 0 0 0 9 1 SCORING OFFENSE Rank Team Gm Yds TD Pts Avg Kxp Oxp Dkxp Doxp FG Sf 1. Cincinnati 12 5008 42 325 27.08 38 0 0 0 11 1 2. Connecticut 13 4235 38 343 26.38 38 0 0 0 25 1 2. Louisville 13 4797 43 343 26.38 41 0 0 0 14 1 4. Pittsburgh 13 4770 41 342 26.31 40 1 0 0 18 0 5. West Virginia 13 4845 42 327 25.15 41 1 0 0 10 1 6. South Fla. 13 4022 37 313 24.08 33 1 0 0 18 1 7. Syracuse 13 4197 34 288 22.15 30 0 0 0 18 0 8. Rutgers 12 3539 30 250 20.83 26 1 0 0 14 0 TOTAL DEFENSE Rank Team Gm Avg Plays Yds TD YdsGm 1. West Virginia 13 4.23 803 3394 17 261.08 2. Syracuse 13 4.58 856 3919 31 301.46 3. Pittsburgh 13 4.74 837 3966 29 305.08 4. Louisville 13 4.98 814 4052 32 311.69 5. South Fla. 13 4.73 874 4133 29 317.92 6. Connecticut 13 5.17 923 4768 33 366.77 7. Cincinnati 12 5.31 835 4433 44 369.42 8. Rutgers 12 5.77 778 4490 41 374.17 TOTAL OFFENSE Rank Team Gm Pl Yds Avg TD YdsGm 1. Cincinnati 12 837 5008 5.98 42 417.33 2. West Virginia 13 908 4845 5.34 42 372.69 3. Louisville 13 835 4797 5.74 43 369.00 4. Pittsburgh 13 830 4770 5.75 41 366.92 5. Connecticut 13 858 4235 4.94 38 325.77 6. Syracuse 13 812 4197 5.17 34 322.85 7. South Fla. 13 810 4022 4.97 37 309.38 8. Rutgers 12 769 3539 4.60 30 294.92 TURNOVER MARGIN Rank Team Gm FGa IGa Gtot FLo ILo Ltot Mrgn 1. Connecticut 13 11 20 31 10 9 19 .92 2. Rutgers 12 14 8 22 5 10 15 .58 3. Louisville 13 10 9 19 8 8 16 .23 4. Pittsburgh 13 9 13 22 11 11 22 .00 5. South Fla. 13 5 15 20 6 16 22 -.15 6. Syracuse 13 8 9 17 13 8 21 -.31 7. West Virginia 13 11 12 23 20 8 28 -.38 8. Cincinnati 12 6 8 14 14 15 29 -1.25