COLLEGE FOOTBALL STATISTICS

2010
 Big East Conference

 ALL-PURPOSE RUNNING
 
 Rank           Player                     Gm  Net Rec  PR Kor Yards Yds/gm
  1. D.J. Woods, Cincinnati                12   87 898 146 728  1859 154.92
  2. Jordan Todman, Connecticut            12 1695  94   0  55  1844 153.67
  3. Ray Graham, Pittsburgh                12  922 213   0 501  1636 136.33
  4. Bilal Powell, Louisville              12 1405 158   0   0  1563 130.25
  5. Isaiah Pead, Cincinnati               11 1029 190   0   0  1219 110.82
  6. Dion Lewis, Pittsburgh                12 1061 216   0   0  1277 106.42
  7. Delone Carter, Syracuse               13 1233  45   0   0  1278  98.31
  8. Noel Devine, West Virginia            13  936 258   0  62  1256  96.62
  9. Jock Sanders, West Virginia           13   92 728  86 299  1205  92.69
 10. Armon Binns, Cincinnati               12    0 110   0   0  1101  91.75
 
 FIELD GOALS
 
 Rank           Player                    Gm Fga Fgm   Avg FgPgm
  1. Dave Teggart, Connecticut            13  31  25  .806  1.92
  2. Ross Krautman, Syracuse              13  19  18  .947  1.38
  2. Dan Hutchins, Pittsburgh             13  25  18  .720  1.38
  4. Maikon Bonani, South Fla.            13  21  17  .810  1.31
  5. San San Te, Rutgers                  12  20  14  .700  1.17
  6. Chris Philpott, Louisville           13  18  14  .778  1.08
  7. Jacob Rogers, Cincinnati             12  14  11  .786   .92
  8. Tyler Bitancurt, West Virginia       13  17  10  .588   .77
 
 INTERCEPTIONS
 
 Rank           Player                 Gm Int Yds  TD IntPgm
  1. Keith Tandy, West Virginia        13   6  51   0    .46
  2. Dom DeCicco, Pittsburgh           12   5  36   0    .42
  3. Johnny Patrick, Louisville        13   5  99   1    .38
  3. Jarred Holley, Pittsburgh         13   5  10   0    .38
  5. Blidi Wreh-Wilson, Connecticut    13   4 153   2    .31
  5. Jerome Junior, Connecticut        13   4  76   1    .31
  7. Brandon Hogan, West Virginia      11   3  78   0    .27
  8. Jerrell Young, South Fla.         12   3  17   0    .25
  9. Wesley Richardson, Cincinnati     11   2  -2   0    .18
  9. Drew Frey, Cincinnati             11   2  15   0    .18
  9. Brandon Bing, Rutgers             11   2  20   0    .18
 
 KICKOFF RETURN
 
 Rank           Player                     Gm KRet  Yds  TD    Avg  RetGm
  1. Nick Williams, Connecticut            11   17  600   2  35.29   1.55
  2. Jeremy Wright, Louisville             11   16  489   1  30.56   1.45
  3. Vic Anderson, Louisville              10   13  393   0  30.23   1.30
  4. Lindsey Lamar, South Fla.             13   34  903   2  26.56   2.62
  5. Joe Lefeged, Rutgers                  12   38  948   0  24.95   3.17
  6. Dorian Graham, Syracuse               13   16  392   0  24.50   1.23
  7. D.J. Woods, Cincinnati                12   32  728   0  22.75   2.67
  8. Prince-Tyson Gulley, Syracuse         10   29  633   0  21.83   2.90
  9. Ray Graham, Pittsburgh                12   23  501   0  21.78   1.92
 10. Cameron Saddler, Pittsburgh           13   22  460   0  20.91   1.69
 
 PASSING EFFICIENCY
 
 Rank           Player              Gm Att Cmp  CPct Int  PYds YdsAtt  TD Rating
  1. Geno Smith, West Virginia      13 372 241 64.78   7  2763   7.43  24 144.70
  2. Zach Collaros, Cincinnati      12 383 225 58.75  14  2902   7.58  26 137.49
  3. Tino Sunseri, Pittsburgh       13 346 223 64.45   9  2572   7.43  16 136.95
  4. Chas Dodd, Rutgers             11 223 123 55.16   7  1637   7.34  11 126.82
  5. Ryan Nassib, Syracuse          13 358 202 56.42   8  2334   6.52  19 124.23
  6. B.J. Daniels, South Fla.       12 245 143 58.37  13  1685   6.88  11 120.34
  7. Zach Frazer, Connecticut       11 261 136 52.11   6  1425   5.46   5  99.69
 
 PUNTING
 
 Rank           Player                     Gm Punt  Yds    Avg  PuntGm
  1. Rob Long, Syracuse                    12   64 2806  43.84    5.33
  2. Patrick O'Donnell, Cincinnati         12   52 2178  41.88    4.33
  3. Teddy Dellaganna, Rutgers              9   54 2261  41.87    6.00
  4. Gregg Pugnetti, West Virginia         13   67 2802  41.82    5.15
  5. Cole Wagner, Connecticut              13   79 3260  41.27    6.08
  6. Justin Brockhaus-Kann, South Fla.     13   64 2406  37.59    4.92
 
 PUNT RETURN
 
 Rank           Player                      Gm Ret Yds  TD    Avg  RetGm
  1. Doug Beaumont, Louisville              11  14 213   1  15.21   1.27
  2. Terrence Mitchell, South Fla.          13  21 232   0  11.05   1.62
  3. Cameron Saddler, Pittsburgh            13  25 263   0  10.52   1.92
  4. Mike Holmes, Syracuse                  13  28 289   0  10.32   2.15
  5. Taylor Mack, Connecticut               11  15 126   0   8.40   1.36
  6. D.J. Woods, Cincinnati                 12  19 146   0   7.68   1.58
  7. Mason Robinson, Rutgers                12  19 139   1   7.32   1.58
 
 RECEPTIONS PER GAME
 
 Rank           Player                     Gm Rec  Yds  TD  RecGm YdsCat   YdsGm
  1. Armon Binns, Cincinnati               12  75 1101  10   6.25  14.68   91.75
  2. Jock Sanders, West Virginia           13  69  728   4   5.31  10.55   56.00
  3. D.J. Woods, Cincinnati                12  57  898   8   4.75  15.75   74.83
  4. Tavon Austin, West Virginia           13  58  787   8   4.46  13.57   60.54
  5. Jonathan Baldwin, Pittsburgh          13  53  822   5   4.08  15.51   63.23
  6. Dontavia Bogan, South Fla.            12  46  673   6   3.83  14.63   56.08
  7. Doug Beaumont, Louisville             11  41  440   1   3.73  10.73   40.00
  8. Mark Harrison, Rutgers                12  44  829   9   3.67  18.84   69.08
  8. Mohamed Sanu, Rutgers                 12  44  418   2   3.67   9.50   34.83
 10. Michael Smith, Connecticut            13  46  615   2   3.54  13.37   47.31
 
 RECEIVING YARDS PER GAME
 
 Rank           Player                   Gm  Rec  Yds  TD  RecGm YdsCat  Yds/gm
  1. Armon Binns, Cincinnati             12   75 1101  10   6.25  14.68   91.75
  2. D.J. Woods, Cincinnati              12   57  898   8   4.75  15.75   74.83
  3. Mark Harrison, Rutgers              12   44  829   9   3.67  18.84   69.08
  4. Jonathan Baldwin, Pittsburgh        13   53  822   5   4.08  15.51   63.23
  5. Tavon Austin, West Virginia         13   58  787   8   4.46  13.57   60.54
  6. Dontavia Bogan, South Fla.          12   46  673   6   3.83  14.63   56.08
  7. Jock Sanders, West Virginia         13   69  728   4   5.31  10.55   56.00
  8. Van Chew, Syracuse                  12   41  611   5   3.42  14.90   50.92
  9. Michael Smith, Connecticut          13   46  615   2   3.54  13.37   47.31
 10. Mike Shanahan, Pittsburgh           13   43  589   1   3.31  13.70   45.31
 
 TOTAL RECEIVING YARDS
 
 Rank           Player                     Gm Rec  Yds  TD  RecGm YdsCat  Yds/gm
  1. Armon Binns, Cincinnati               12  75 1101  10   6.25  14.68   91.75
  2. D.J. Woods, Cincinnati                12  57  898   8   4.75  15.75   74.83
  3. Mark Harrison, Rutgers                12  44  829   9   3.67  18.84   69.08
  4. Jonathan Baldwin, Pittsburgh          13  53  822   5   4.08  15.51   63.23
  5. Tavon Austin, West Virginia           13  58  787   8   4.46  13.57   60.54
  6. Jock Sanders, West Virginia           13  69  728   4   5.31  10.55   56.00
  7. Dontavia Bogan, South Fla.            12  46  673   6   3.83  14.63   56.08
  8. Michael Smith, Connecticut            13  46  615   2   3.54  13.37   47.31
  9. Van Chew, Syracuse                    12  41  611   5   3.42  14.90   50.92
 10. Mike Shanahan, Pittsburgh             13  43  589   1   3.31  13.70   45.31
 
 RUSHING
 
 Rank           Player                     Gm Rush  Yds   TD Yds/gm
  1. Jordan Todman, Connecticut            12  334 1695   14 141.25
  2. Bilal Powell, Louisville              12  229 1405   11 117.08
  3. Delone Carter, Syracuse               13  231 1233    9  94.85
  4. Isaiah Pead, Cincinnati               11  157 1029    6  93.55
  5. Dion Lewis, Pittsburgh                12  219 1061   13  88.42
  6. Ray Graham, Pittsburgh                12  148  922    8  76.83
  7. Noel Devine, West Virginia            13  209  936    6  72.00
  8. Moise Plancher, South Fla.            13  176  793    5  61.00
  9. Demetris Murray, South Fla.           11  121  533    4  48.45
 10. Antwon Bailey, Syracuse               13  114  554    2  42.62
 
 SCORING
 
 Rank          Player                   Gm  TD Okm Oka FGM FGA Pts  PtsGm
  1. Dave Teggart, Connecticut          13   0  36  36  25  31 111   8.54
  2. Dan Hutchins, Pittsburgh           13   0  40  40  18  25  94   7.23
  3. Bilal Powell, Louisville           12  14   0   0   0   0  84   7.00
  3. Jordan Todman, Connecticut         12  14   0   0   0   0  84   7.00
  5. Dion Lewis, Pittsburgh             12  13   0   0   0   0  78   6.50
  6. Ross Krautman, Syracuse            13   0  30  32  18  19  84   6.46
  7. Chris Philpott, Louisville         13   0  41  43  14  18  83   6.38
  8. Jacob Rogers, Cincinnati           12   0  38  40  11  14  71   5.92
  9. San San Te, Rutgers                12   0  26  26  14  20  68   5.67
 10. Tyler Bitancurt, West Virginia     13   0  41  41  10  17  71   5.46
 
 TOTAL OFFENSE
 
 Rank           Player                 Gm Rush  Net  Pyd   Pl TotYd YdsPl  YdsGm
  1. Zach Collaros, Cincinnati         12  121  202 2902  504  3104  6.16 258.67
  2. Geno Smith, West Virginia         13  106  217 2763  478  2980  6.23 229.23
  3. Tino Sunseri, Pittsburgh          13   53  108 2572  399  2680  6.72 206.15
  4. Ryan Nassib, Syracuse             13   66  -39 2334  424  2295  5.41 176.54
  5. B.J. Daniels, South Fla.          12  112  259 1685  357  1944  5.45 162.00
  6. Jordan Todman, Connecticut        12  334 1695    0  334  1695  5.07 141.25
  7. Zach Frazer, Connecticut          11   29   14 1425  290  1439  4.96 130.82
  8. Chas Dodd, Rutgers                11   62 -253 1637  285  1384  4.86 125.82
  9. Bilal Powell, Louisville          12  229 1405    0  229  1405  6.14 117.08
 10. Delone Carter, Syracuse           13  231 1233    0  231  1233  5.34  94.85
 
 PASS EFFICIENCY DEFENSE
 
 Rank           Team        Gm Att Cmp  PPct Int   Yds YdAtt  TD TDPct  Rating
  1. West Virginia          13 393 228 58.02  12  2270  5.78  12  3.05  110.49
  2. Syracuse               13 368 208 56.52   9  2149  5.84  15  4.08  114.11
  3. Pittsburgh             13 394 224 56.85  13  2406  6.11  15  3.81  114.16
  4. Connecticut            13 445 261 58.65  20  2906  6.53  16  3.60  116.43
  5. South Fla.             13 404 238 58.91  15  2500  6.19  18  4.46  118.16
  6. Louisville             13 343 188 54.81   9  2176  6.34  16  4.66  118.24
  7. Rutgers                12 336 207 61.61   8  2613  7.78  19  5.65  140.82
  8. Cincinnati             12 370 240 64.86   8  2808  7.59  25  6.76  146.62
 
 KICKOFF RETURNS
 
 Rank           Team       Gm Ret   Yds  TD    Avg
  1. Connecticut           13  55  1487   3  27.04
  2. Louisville            13  45  1147   1  25.49
  3. Rutgers               12  56  1280   0  22.86
  4. South Fla.            13  49  1106   2  22.57
  5. Syracuse              13  48  1079   0  22.48
  6. Pittsburgh            13  51  1040   0  20.39
  7. Cincinnati            12  59  1191   0  20.19
  8. West Virginia         13  42   805   0  19.17
 
 NET PUNTING
 
 Rank           Team     Punt Avg Ret RYds NetAvg TotYd
  1. Pittsburgh            46  43  20  101  39.85  2014
  2. Syracuse              66  43  23  168  38.48  2868
  3. West Virginia         67  41  18  156  37.70  2802
  4. Cincinnati            55  40  17   81  37.29  2232
  5. Louisville            67  40  20  102  37.13  2690
  6. Rutgers               76  40  28  310  35.21  3086
  7. Connecticut           79  41  33  362  34.41  3260
  8. South Fla.            65  37  19  184  34.18  2406
 
 PASSING OFFENSE
 
 Rank           Team    Gm Att Cmp Int   PPct  Yds YdAtt  TD   YdsGm YdsCmp
  1. Cincinnati         12 435 251  15  57.70 3128  7.19  27  260.67  12.46
  2. West Virginia      13 382 245   8  64.14 2769  7.25  24  213.00  11.30
  3. Pittsburgh         13 360 230  11  63.89 2616  7.27  16  201.23  11.37
  4. Rutgers            12 324 176  10  54.32 2328  7.19  16  194.00  13.23
  5. Louisville         13 363 217   8  59.78 2522  6.95  22  194.00  11.62
  6. Syracuse           13 364 205   8  56.32 2375  6.52  19  182.69  11.59
  7. South Fla.         13 323 185  16  57.28 2139  6.62  13  164.54  11.56
  8. Connecticut        13 357 188   9  52.66 1964  5.50  10  151.08  10.45
 
 PASS DEFENSE
 
 Rank           Team     Gm Att Cmp   PPct YdsCmp Int   Yds  YdAtt  TD   YdsGm
  1. Syracuse            13 368 208  56.52  10.33   9  2149   5.84  15  165.31
  2. Louisville          13 343 188  54.81  11.57   9  2176   6.34  16  167.38
  3. West Virginia       13 393 228  58.02   9.96  12  2270   5.78  12  174.62
  4. Pittsburgh          13 394 224  56.85  10.74  13  2406   6.11  15  185.08
  5. South Fla.          13 404 238  58.91  10.50  15  2500   6.19  18  192.31
  6. Rutgers             12 336 207  61.61  12.62   8  2613   7.78  19  217.75
  7. Connecticut         13 445 261  58.65  11.13  20  2906   6.53  16  223.54
  8. Cincinnati          12 370 240  64.86  11.70   8  2808   7.59  25  234.00
 
 PASSING EFFICIENCY
 
 Rank           Team     Gm Att Cmp   PPct Int   Yds  YdAtt  TD  TPct  Rating
  1. West Virginia       13 382 245  64.14   8  2769   7.25  24  6.28  141.53
  2. Louisville          13 363 217  59.78   8  2522   6.95  22  6.06  133.75
  3. Pittsburgh          13 360 230  63.89  11  2616   7.27  16  4.44  133.50
  4. Cincinnati          12 435 251  57.70  15  3128   7.19  27  6.21  131.69
  5. Rutgers             12 324 176  54.32  10  2328   7.19  16  4.94  124.78
  6. Syracuse            13 364 205  56.32   8  2375   6.52  19  5.22  123.94
  7. South Fla.          13 323 185  57.28  16  2139   6.62  13  4.02  116.30
  8. Connecticut         13 357 188  52.66   9  1964   5.50  10  2.80  103.11
 
 PUNT RETURNS
 
 Rank           Team     Gm Ret  Yds Tds    Avg
  1. Louisville          13  23  290   1  12.61
  2. Pittsburgh          13  28  344   0  12.29
  3. South Fla.          13  27  312   2  11.56
  4. Syracuse            13  32  294   0   9.19
  5. Rutgers             12  24  211   3   8.79
  6. West Virginia       13  22  185   0   8.41
  7. Connecticut         13  28  229   0   8.18
  8. Cincinnati          12  21  151   0   7.19
 
 RUSHING OFFENSE
 
 Rank           Team     Gm Rush  Net   Avg Tds   YdsGm
  1. Louisville          13  472 2275  4.82  17  175.00
  2. Connecticut         13  501 2271  4.53  20  174.69
  3. Pittsburgh          13  470 2154  4.58  24  165.69
  4. West Virginia       13  526 2076  3.95  18  159.69
  5. Cincinnati          12  402 1880  4.68  15  156.67
  6. South Fla.          13  487 1883  3.87  19  144.85
  7. Syracuse            13  448 1822  4.07  14  140.15
  8. Rutgers             12  445 1211  2.72  11  100.92
 
 RUSHING DEFENSE
 
 Rank           Team      Gm Rush  Net   Avg  TD   YdsGm
  1. West Virginia        13  410 1124  2.74   3   86.46
  2. Pittsburgh           13  443 1560  3.52  12  120.00
  3. South Fla.           13  470 1633  3.47   8  125.62
  4. Cincinnati           12  465 1625  3.49  19  135.42
  5. Syracuse             13  488 1770  3.63  14  136.15
  6. Connecticut          13  478 1862  3.90  13  143.23
  7. Louisville           13  471 1876  3.98  14  144.31
  8. Rutgers              12  442 1877  4.25  20  156.42
 
 SCORING DEFENSE
 
 Rank           Team    Gm Pts   PtGm  TD Kxp Oxp Dkxp Doxp   FG Sf
  1. West Virginia      13 176  13.54  17  17   0    0    0   19  0
  2. Pittsburgh         13 247  19.00  29  28   0    0    0   15  0
  3. Syracuse           13 251  19.31  31  29   0    0    0   12  0
  4. Louisville         13 252  19.38  32  28   1    0    0   10  0
  5. South Fla.         13 260  20.00  29  26   0    0    0   20  0
  6. Connecticut        13 286  22.00  33  31   0    0    0   19  0
  7. Rutgers            12 318  26.50  41  37   0    0    0   11  1
  8. Cincinnati         12 336  28.00  44  43   0    0    0    9  1
 
 SCORING OFFENSE
 
 Rank           Team    Gm  Yds  TD Pts    Avg Kxp Oxp Dkxp Doxp   FG  Sf
  1. Cincinnati         12 5008  42 325  27.08  38   0    0    0   11   1
  2. Connecticut        13 4235  38 343  26.38  38   0    0    0   25   1
  2. Louisville         13 4797  43 343  26.38  41   0    0    0   14   1
  4. Pittsburgh         13 4770  41 342  26.31  40   1    0    0   18   0
  5. West Virginia      13 4845  42 327  25.15  41   1    0    0   10   1
  6. South Fla.         13 4022  37 313  24.08  33   1    0    0   18   1
  7. Syracuse           13 4197  34 288  22.15  30   0    0    0   18   0
  8. Rutgers            12 3539  30 250  20.83  26   1    0    0   14   0
 
 TOTAL DEFENSE
 
 Rank           Team     Gm   Avg Plays  Yds  TD   YdsGm
  1. West Virginia       13  4.23   803 3394  17  261.08
  2. Syracuse            13  4.58   856 3919  31  301.46
  3. Pittsburgh          13  4.74   837 3966  29  305.08
  4. Louisville          13  4.98   814 4052  32  311.69
  5. South Fla.          13  4.73   874 4133  29  317.92
  6. Connecticut         13  5.17   923 4768  33  366.77
  7. Cincinnati          12  5.31   835 4433  44  369.42
  8. Rutgers             12  5.77   778 4490  41  374.17
 
 TOTAL OFFENSE
 
 Rank           Team     Gm  Pl  Yds   Avg   TD   YdsGm
  1. Cincinnati          12 837 5008  5.98   42  417.33
  2. West Virginia       13 908 4845  5.34   42  372.69
  3. Louisville          13 835 4797  5.74   43  369.00
  4. Pittsburgh          13 830 4770  5.75   41  366.92
  5. Connecticut         13 858 4235  4.94   38  325.77
  6. Syracuse            13 812 4197  5.17   34  322.85
  7. South Fla.          13 810 4022  4.97   37  309.38
  8. Rutgers             12 769 3539  4.60   30  294.92
 
 TURNOVER MARGIN
 
 Rank           Team     Gm FGa IGa Gtot FLo ILo Ltot  Mrgn
  1. Connecticut         13  11  20   31  10   9   19   .92
  2. Rutgers             12  14   8   22   5  10   15   .58
  3. Louisville          13  10   9   19   8   8   16   .23
  4. Pittsburgh          13   9  13   22  11  11   22   .00
  5. South Fla.          13   5  15   20   6  16   22  -.15
  6. Syracuse            13   8   9   17  13   8   21  -.31
  7. West Virginia       13  11  12   23  20   8   28  -.38
  8. Cincinnati          12   6   8   14  14  15   29 -1.25
  


D1SportsNet
D1SportsNet

FACEBOOK INSTAGRAM PINTEREST TWITTER YOUTUBE