D1SportsNet


2009


 Conference USA
 
 Rank           Player               Gm  Net Rec  PR Kor Yards Yds/gm
  1. Damaris Johnson, Tulsa          12  175 113 256 113  2693 224.42
  2. Donald Buckram, UTEP            12 1594 453   0   0  2047 170.58
  3. Darius Marshall, Marshall       10 1131  27   0 486  1644 164.40
  4. Tyron Carrier, Houston          14  125 102  73 986  2213 158.07
  5. Dwayne Harris, East Carolina    14  149 978   7 100  2134 152.43
  6. Jeremy Williams, Tulane         12  167 111   0 483  1763 146.92
  7. Curtis Steele, Memphis          10 1239 123   0   0  1362 136.20
  8. Emmanuel Sanders, SMU           13    6 133 275   0  1620 124.62
  9. Joe Webb, UAB                   12 1427  12   0   0  1439 119.92
 10. Shawnbrey McNeal, SMU           13 1188 283   0  66  1537 118.23
 
 FIELD GOALS
 
 Rank           Player                    Gm Fga Fgm    Avg FgPgm
  1. Ben Hartman, East Carolina           13  30  20   .667  1.54
  2. Josh Zahn, UAB                       12  21  14   .667  1.17
  3. Craig Ratanamorn, Marshall           13  17  15   .882  1.15
  4. Logan Barrett, UTEP                  12  18  13   .722  1.08
  4. Kevin Fitzpatrick, Tulsa             12  14  13   .929  1.08
  6. Nick Cattoi, UCF                     13  20  14   .700  1.08
  7. Matt Hogan, Houston                  13  12  12  1.000   .92
  8. Matt Reagan, Memphis                 12  16  11   .688   .92
  9. Matt Szymanski, SMU                  13  16  11   .688   .85
 10. Ross Thevenot, Tulane                12  13   9   .692   .75
 11. Clark Fangmeier, Rice                12  15   8   .533   .67
 12. Daniel Hrapmann, Southern Miss.      13   7   4   .571   .31
 
 INTERCEPTIONS
 
 Rank           Player                      Gm Int Yds  TD IntPgm
  1. Josh Robinson, UCF                     13   6  84   1    .46
  2. Van Eskridge, East Carolina            14   6 126   0    .43
  3. John Destin, Tulsa                     10   4  83   0    .40
  4. Eddie Hicks, Southern Miss.            13   5  62   0    .38
  4. Rock Dennis, SMU                       13   5  82   1    .38
  6. Jamal Robinson, Houston                14   5  42   1    .36
  7. Brandon Brinkley, Houston              14   4 108   1    .29
  8. DeQuan Bembry, Marshall                12   3   0   0    .25
  8. Marquis Coleman, UAB                   12   3 100   1    .25
 10. Bryan McCann, SMU                      13   3  43   0    .23
 
 KICKOFF RETURN
 
 Rank           Player                   Gm KRet  Yds  TD    Avg  RetGm
  1. Tyron Carrier, Houston              14   34  986   4  29.00   2.43
  2. Tracy Lampley, Southern Miss.       13   17  469   1  27.59   1.31
  3. Dwayne Harris, East Carolina        14   37 1000   3  27.03   2.64
  4. Freddie Parham, Southern Miss.      13   38  961   1  25.29   2.92
  5. Damaris Johnson, Tulsa              12   46 1131   0  24.59   3.83
  6. Bryan McCann, SMU                   13   34  824   0  24.24   2.62
  7. Quincy McDuffie, UCF                13   39  944   1  24.21   3.00
  8. Jeremy Williams, Tulane             12   20  483   1  24.15   1.67
  9. Marlon McClure, UTEP                 9   27  641   0  23.74   3.00
 10. Marcus Hightower, Memphis            9   24  535   0  22.29   2.67
 
 PASSING EFFICIENCY
 
 Rank           Player              Gm Att Cmp  CPct Int PYds YdsAtt  TD  Rating
  1. Case Keenum, Houston           14 700 492 70.29  15 5671   8.10  44  154.79
  2. Joe Webb, UAB                  12 271 162 59.78   8 2299   8.48  21  150.71
  3. Martevious Young, USM          10 230 132 57.39   3 1861   8.09  16  145.71
  4. G.J. Kinne, Tulsa              12 345 210 60.87  10 2732   7.92  22  142.63
  5. Brett Hodges, UCF              12 329 197 59.88  13 2438   7.41  17  131.27
  6. Trevor Vittatoe, UTEP          12 409 224 54.77  13 3308   8.09  17  130.07
  7. Ryan Griffin, Tulane            9 222 141 63.51   6 1382   6.23   9  123.78
  8. Patrick Pinkney, East Carolina 14 440 259 58.86  12 2947   6.70  15  120.92
  9. Will Hudgens, Memphis           9 236 143 60.59   6 1544   6.54   7  120.25
 10. Brian Anderson, Marshall       13 398 231 58.04  13 2646   6.65  14  118.96
 
 PUNTING
 
 Rank           Player                    Gm Punt  Yds   Avg PuntGm
  1. Matt Dodge, East Carolina            14   67 3069 45.81   4.79
  2. Matt Reagan, Memphis                 12   63 2868 45.52   5.25
  3. Michael Such, Tulsa                  12   57 2538 44.53   4.75
  4. Kyle Martens, Rice                    9   48 2094 43.63   5.33
  5. Greg Hiett, UTEP                     12   49 2101 42.88   4.08
  6. Trey Ragland, UAB                    12   55 2352 42.76   4.58
  7. Matt Szymanski, SMU                  13   70 2930 41.86   5.38
  8. Ross Thevenot, Tulane                12   49 2028 41.39   4.08
  9. Kase Whitehead, Marshall             13   63 2469 39.19   4.85
 10. Peter Boehme, Southern Miss.         12   54 2078 38.48   4.50
 11. Blake Clingan, UCF                   13   65 2422 37.26   5.00
 
 PUNT RETURN
 
 Rank           Player                    Gm  Ret Yds  TD    Avg   RetGm
  1. Tracy Lampley, Southern Miss.        13   23 334   1  14.52    1.77
  2. Damaris Johnson, Tulsa               12   18 256   1  14.22    1.50
  3. Emmanuel Sanders, SMU                13   20 275   1  13.75    1.54
 
 RECEPTIONS PER GAME
 
 Rank           Player                Gm  Rec  Yds  TD  RecGm YdsCat   YdsGm
  1. James Cleveland, Houston         12  104 1214  14   8.67  11.67  101.17
  2. Emmanuel Sanders, SMU            13   98 1339   7   7.54  13.66  103.00
  3. Jeremy Williams, Tulane          12   84 1113   7   7.00  13.25   92.75
  4. Damaris Johnson, Tulsa           12   78 1131   3   6.50  14.50   94.25
  4. Tyron Carrier, Houston           14   91 1029   7   6.50  11.31   73.50
  6. Patrick Edwards, Houston         14   85 1021   6   6.07  12.01   72.93
  7. Dwayne Harris, East Carolina     14   83  978   7   5.93  11.78   69.86
  8. Duke Calhoun, Memphis            12   68  923   5   5.67  13.57   76.92
  9. Cody Slate, Marshall             10   50  607   4   5.00  12.14   60.70
  9. Charles Sims, Houston            14   70  759   1   5.00  10.84   54.21
  9. Toren Dixon, Rice                12   60  660   6   5.00  11.00   55.00
 
 RECEIVING YARDS PER GAME
 
 Rank           Player                  Gm Rec  Yds  TD  RecGm YdsCat  Yds/gm
  1. Emmanuel Sanders, SMU              13  98 1339   7   7.54  13.66  103.00
  2. James Cleveland, Houston           12 104 1214  14   8.67  11.67  101.17
  3. Damaris Johnson, Tulsa             12  78 1131   3   6.50  14.50   94.25
  4. Jeremy Williams, Tulane            12  84 1113   7   7.00  13.25   92.75
  5. Jeff Moturi, UTEP                  12  53  974   4   4.42  18.38   81.17
  6. Duke Calhoun, Memphis              12  68  923   5   5.67  13.57   76.92
  7. Tyron Carrier, Houston             14  91 1029   7   6.50  11.31   73.50
  8. Patrick Edwards, Houston           14  85 1021   6   6.07  12.01   72.93
  9. DeAndre Brown, Southern Miss.      11  47  785   9   4.27  16.70   71.36
 10. Dwayne Harris, East Carolina       14  83  978   7   5.93  11.78   69.86
 
 TOTAL RECEIVING YARDS
 
 Rank           Player                Gm Rec  Yds  TD  RecGm YdsCat  Yds/gm
  1. Emmanuel Sanders, SMU            13  98 1339   7   7.54  13.66  103.00
  2. James Cleveland, Houston         12 104 1214  14   8.67  11.67  101.17
  3. Damaris Johnson, Tulsa           12  78 1131   3   6.50  14.50   94.25
  4. Jeremy Williams, Tulane          12  84 1113   7   7.00  13.25   92.75
  5. Tyron Carrier, Houston           14  91 1029   7   6.50  11.31   73.50
  6. Patrick Edwards, Houston         14  85 1021   6   6.07  12.01   72.93
  7. Dwayne Harris, East Carolina     14  83  978   7   5.93  11.78   69.86
  8. Jeff Moturi, UTEP                12  53  974   4   4.42  18.38   81.17
  9. Duke Calhoun, Memphis            12  68  923   5   5.67  13.57   76.92
 10. Aldrick Robinson, SMU            13  47  800   5   3.62  17.02   61.54
 
 RUSHING
 
 Rank           Player                      Gm Rush   Yds  TD  Yds/gm
  1. Donald Buckram, UTEP                   12  259  1594  18  132.83
  2. Curtis Steele, Memphis                 10  198  1239  15  123.90
  3. Joe Webb, UAB                          12  227  1427  11  118.92
  4. Darius Marshall, Marshall              10  227  1131  11  113.10
  5. Dominique Lindsay, East Carolina       12  239  1180   6   98.33
  6. Brynn Harvey, UCF                      12  261  1109  14   92.42
  7. Shawnbrey McNeal, SMU                  13  236  1188  12   91.38
  8. Andre Anderson, Tulane                 12  238  1016   8   84.67
  9. Damion Fletcher, Southern Miss.        12  219  1015   8   84.58
 10. Bryce Beall, Houston                   13  139   670   7   51.54
 
 SCORING
 
 Rank           Player                    Gm  TD  Okm Oka FGM FGA Pts  PtsGm
  1. Donald Buckram, UTEP                 12  21    0   0   0   0 126  10.50
  2. Curtis Steele, Memphis               10  16    0   0   0   0  96   9.60
  3. Ben Hartman, East Carolina           13   0   34  34  20  30  94   7.23
  4. Brynn Harvey, UCF                    12  14    0   0   0   0  84   7.00
  4. James Cleveland, Houston             12  14    0   0   0   0  84   7.00
  6. Kevin Fitzpatrick, Tulsa             12   0   42  44  13  14  81   6.75
  7. Darius Marshall, Marshall            10  11    0   0   0   0  66   6.60
  8. Logan Barrett, UTEP                  12   0   39  41  13  18  78   6.50
  9. Shawnbrey McNeal, SMU                13  14    0   0   0   0  84   6.46
 10. Dwayne Harris, East Carolina         14  15    0   0   0   0  90   6.43
 
 TOTAL OFFENSE
 
 Rank           Player               Gm Rush   Net  Pyd  Pl TotYd YdsPl   YdsGm
  1. Case Keenum, Houston            14   60   158 5671 760  5829  7.67  416.36
  2. Joe Webb, UAB                   12  227  1427 2299 498  3726  7.48  310.50
  3. Trevor Vittatoe, UTEP           12   45   -83 3308 454  3225  7.10  268.75
  4. G.J. Kinne, Tulsa               12  150   399 2732 495  3131  6.33  260.92
  5. Patrick Pinkney, East Carolina  14   48    81 2947 488  3028  6.20  216.29
  6. Martevious Young, Southern Miss 10   72   294 1861 302  2155  7.14  215.50
  7. Brian Anderson, Marshall        13   64    20 2646 462  2666  5.77  205.08
  8. Brett Hodges, UCF               12   59   -18 2438 388  2420  6.24  201.67
  9. Will Hudgens, Memphis            9   16   -58 1544 252  1486  5.90  165.11
 10. Nick Fanuzzi, Rice              10   38    -1 1598 308  1597  5.19  159.70
 
 PASS EFFICIENCY DEFENSE
 
 Rank           Team      Gm Att Cmp   PPct Int   Yds  YdAtt  TD TDPct  Rating
  1. SMU                  13 435 243  55.86  17  2995   6.89  20  4.60  121.09
  2. East Carolina        14 535 326  60.93  17  3612   6.75  24  4.49  126.06
  3. Marshall             13 442 257  58.14   9  3080   6.97  20  4.52  127.49
  4. Southern Miss.       13 482 299  62.03  12  3401   7.06  21  4.36  130.67
  5. Houston              14 428 268  62.62  11  3146   7.35  15  3.50  130.77
  6. UCF                  13 455 281  61.76  12  3481   7.65  20  4.40  135.30
  7. Tulsa                12 392 227  57.91   9  3002   7.66  23  5.87  137.00
  8. UTEP                 12 401 247  61.60  11  2953   7.36  25  6.23  138.55
  9. UAB                  12 446 290  65.02  11  3738   8.38  27  6.05  150.45
 10. Memphis              12 382 233  60.99   9  3401   8.90  29  7.59  156.13
 11. Tulane               12 302 204  67.55   5  2616   8.66  19  6.29  157.71
 12. Rice                 12 361 240  66.48   6  3281   9.09  28  7.76  165.12
 
 KICKOFF RETURNS
 
 Rank           Team     Gm  Ret  Yds  TD    Avg
  1. UCF                 13   53 1314   1  24.79
  2. Southern Miss.      13   64 1586   2  24.78
  3. East Carolina       14   56 1308   3  23.36
  4. Houston             14   67 1555   5  23.21
  5. Tulsa               12   64 1424   0  22.25
  6. SMU                 13   55 1206   0  21.93
  7. Rice                12   77 1653   0  21.47
  8. UTEP                12   61 1304   0  21.38
  9. UAB                 12   52 1078   0  20.73
 10. Memphis             12   66 1357   0  20.56
 11. Tulane              12   76 1486   1  19.55
 12. Marshall            13   49  957   0  19.53
 
 NET PUNTING
 
 Rank           Team  Punt Avg Ret RYds NetAvg TotYd
  1. East Carolina      68  45  26  277  39.12  3077
  2. Memphis            65  44  21  272  38.83  2896
  3. Rice               77  43  29  295  38.17  3354
  4. UTEP               52  43  16  213  37.83  2240
  5. Tulsa              69  42  28  175  37.13  2957
  6. Southern Miss.     54  38  14   53  36.39  2078
  7. UAB                57  41  24  217  36.00  2369
  8. UCF                65  37  14   32  35.54  2422
  9. SMU                70  41  26  286  35.20  2930
 10. Houston            45  41  13  158  34.44  1888
 11. Marshall           68  38  25  200  33.37  2609
 12. Tulane             53  38  25  442  28.79  2028
 
 PASSING OFFENSE
 
 Rank           Team      Gm Att Cmp Int   PPct  Yds  YdAtt  TD   YdsGm  YdsCmp
  1. Houston              14 747 525  15  70.28 6072   8.13  47  433.71   11.57
  2. SMU                  13 472 286  14  60.59 3666   7.77  22  282.00   12.82
  3. UTEP                 12 422 229  13  54.27 3331   7.89  17  277.58   14.55
  4. Tulsa                12 389 228  10  58.61 3112   8.00  25  259.33   13.65
  5. Southern Miss.       13 391 242   6  61.89 3055   7.81  27  235.00   12.62
  6. East Carolina        14 452 265  12  58.63 3043   6.73  15  217.36   11.48
  7. Memphis              12 405 242  15  59.75 2578   6.37  13  214.83   10.65
  8. UCF                  13 379 223  13  58.84 2734   7.21  21  210.31   12.26
  9. Tulane               12 373 234  14  62.73 2486   6.66  13  207.17   10.62
 10. Marshall             13 404 233  13  57.67 2683   6.64  14  206.38   11.52
 11. UAB                  12 291 169   8  58.08 2352   8.08  22  196.00   13.92
 12. Rice                 12 452 248  17  54.87 2344   5.19  14  195.33    9.45
 
 PASS DEFENSE
 
 Rank           Team    Gm Att Cmp   PPct  YdsCmp Int   Yds  YdAtt  TD   YdsGm
  1. Tulane             12 302 204  67.55   12.82   5  2616   8.66  19  218.00
  2. Houston            14 428 268  62.62   11.74  11  3146   7.35  15  224.71
  3. SMU                13 435 243  55.86   12.33  17  2995   6.89  20  230.38
  4. Marshall           13 442 257  58.14   11.98   9  3080   6.97  20  236.92
  5. UTEP               12 401 247  61.60   11.96  11  2953   7.36  25  246.08
  6. Tulsa              12 392 227  57.91   13.22   9  3002   7.66  23  250.17
  7. East Carolina      14 535 326  60.93   11.08  17  3612   6.75  24  258.00
  8. Southern Miss.     13 482 299  62.03   11.37  12  3401   7.06  21  261.62
  9. UCF                13 455 281  61.76   12.39  12  3481   7.65  20  267.77
 10. Rice               12 361 240  66.48   13.67   6  3281   9.09  28  273.42
 11. Memphis            12 382 233  60.99   14.60   9  3401   8.90  29  283.42
 12. UAB                12 446 290  65.02   12.89  11  3738   8.38  27  311.50
 
 PASSING EFFICIENCY
 
 Rank           Team    Gm Att Cmp   PPct  Int   Yds  YdAtt  TD  TPct  Rating
  1. Houston            14 747 525  70.28   15  6072   8.13  47  6.29  155.33
  2. Southern Miss.     13 391 242  61.89    6  3055   7.81  27  6.91  147.25
  3. UAB                12 291 169  58.08    8  2352   8.08  22  7.56  145.44
  4. Tulsa              12 389 228  58.61   10  3112   8.00  25  6.43  141.87
  5. SMU                13 472 286  60.59   14  3666   7.77  22  4.66  135.29
  6. UCF                13 379 223  58.84   13  2734   7.21  21  5.54  130.82
  7. UTEP               12 422 229  54.27   13  3331   7.89  17  4.03  127.74
  8. Tulane             12 373 234  62.73   14  2486   6.66  13  3.49  122.68
  9. East Carolina      14 452 265  58.63   12  3043   6.73  15  3.32  120.79
 10. Marshall           13 404 233  57.67   13  2683   6.64  14  3.47  118.49
 11. Memphis            12 405 242  59.75   15  2578   6.37  13  3.21  116.45
 12. Rice               12 452 248  54.87   17  2344   5.19  14  3.10  101.16
 
 PUNT RETURNS
 
 Rank           Team    Gm Ret  Yds  Tds    Avg
  1. Tulsa              12  20  282    1  14.10
  2. Rice               12  16  210    0  13.13
  3. SMU                13  21  275    1  13.10
  4. Marshall           13  26  312    1  12.00
  5. UCF                13  26  311    0  11.96
  6. Southern Miss.     13  32  367    1  11.47
  7. East Carolina      14  18  204    0  11.33
  8. Houston            14  16  141    0   8.81
  9. UTEP               12  13  110    0   8.46
 10. Tulane             12   9   52    0   5.78
 11. UAB                12  13   59    0   4.54
 12. Memphis            12  20   60    0   3.00
 
 RUSHING OFFENSE
 
 Rank           Team    Gm Rush  Net  Avg  Tds   YdsGm
  1. UAB                12  463 2759 5.96   17  229.92
  2. Southern Miss.     13  512 2358 4.61   23  181.38
  3. Memphis            12  436 1899 4.36   20  158.25
  4. East Carolina      14  529 2129 4.02   24  152.07
  5. UTEP               12  401 1813 4.52   27  151.08
  6. Tulsa              12  480 1809 3.77   19  150.75
  7. Marshall           13  471 1855 3.94   18  142.69
  8. UCF                13  480 1697 3.54   20  130.54
  9. Houston            14  403 1815 4.50   23  129.64
 10. SMU                13  378 1427 3.78   23  109.77
 11. Rice               12  407 1311 3.22   14  109.25
 12. Tulane             12  395 1264 3.20   10  105.33
 
 RUSHING DEFENSE
 
 Rank           Team    Gm  Rush  Net   Avg  TD   YdsGm
  1. UCF                13   416 1076  2.59  12   82.77
  2. East Carolina      14   449 1684  3.75  11  120.29
  3. Southern Miss.     13   468 1701  3.63  18  130.85
  4. Marshall           13   405 1753  4.33  18  134.85
  5. UAB                12   411 1724  4.19  21  143.67
  6. Tulsa              12   456 1764  3.87   9  147.00
  7. SMU                13   494 2167  4.39  22  166.69
  8. Memphis            12   472 2089  4.43  22  174.08
  9. Rice               12   483 2287  4.73  36  190.58
 10. UTEP               12   479 2410  5.03  25  200.83
 11. Tulane             12   502 2458  4.90  33  204.83
 12. Houston            14   621 3172  5.11  37  226.57
 
 SCORING DEFENSE
 
 Rank           Team    Gm Pts   PtGm   TD Kxp Oxp Dkxp Doxp   FG  Sf
  1. East Carolina      14 307  21.93   38  32   1    0    0   15   0
  2. UCF                13 293  22.54   37  32   0    0    0   13   0
  3. Marshall           13 316  24.31   41  38   1    0    0   10   0
  4. Southern Miss.     13 336  25.85   40  36   1    2    0   18   0
  5. Tulsa              12 328  27.33   38  33   2    0    0   21   0
  6. SMU                13 359  27.62   48  39   1    0    0   10   0
  7. Houston            14 421  30.07   56  49   0    0    0   12   0
  8. UAB                12 388  32.33   50  47   1    0    0   13   0
  9. UTEP               12 402  33.50   53  49   0    0    0   11   1
 10. Memphis            12 418  34.83   53  49   0    0    0   17   0
 11. Tulane             12 440  36.67   57  49   2    0    0   15   0
 12. Rice               12 517  43.08   70  64   0    0    0   11   0
 
 SCORING OFFENSE
 
 Rank           Team     Gm  Yds  TD Pts    Avg  Kxp Oxp Dkxp Doxp   FG  Sf
  1. Houston             14 7887  77 591  42.21   65   1    1    0   20   0
  2. Southern Miss.      13 5413  57 428  32.92   42   1    0    0   14   0
  3. UTEP                12 5144  46 358  29.83   39   2    0    0   13   0
  4. Tulsa               12 4921  45 351  29.25   42   0    0    0   13   0
  5. SMU                 13 5093  50 380  29.23   47   0    0    0   11   0
  6. UAB                 12 5111  42 333  27.75   35   2    0    0   14   0
  7. East Carolina       14 5172  45 378  27.00   44   0    1    0   20   1
  8. UCF                 13 4431  43 340  26.15   38   1    0    0   14   0
  9. Memphis             12 4477  33 262  21.83   31   0    0    0   11   0
 10. Marshall            13 4538  34 283  21.77   34   0    0    0   15   0
 11. Rice                12 3655  28 219  18.25   25   1    0    0    8   0
 12. Tulane              12 3750  24 193  16.08   22   0    0    0    9   0
 
 TOTAL DEFENSE
 
 Rank           Team     Gm   Avg Plays  Yds  TD   YdsGm
  1. UCF                 13  5.23   871 4557  37  350.54
  2. Marshall            13  5.71   847 4833  41  371.77
  3. East Carolina       14  5.38   984 5296  38  378.29
  4. Southern Miss.      13  5.37   950 5102  40  392.46
  5. SMU                 13  5.56   929 5162  48  397.08
  6. Tulsa               12  5.62   848 4766  38  397.17
  7. Tulane              12  6.31   804 5074  57  422.83
  8. UTEP                12  6.09   880 5363  53  446.92
  9. Houston             14  6.02   104 6318  56  451.29
 10. UAB                 12  6.37   857 5462  50  455.17
 11. Memphis             12  6.43   854 5490  53  457.50
 12. Rice                12  6.60   844 5568  70  464.00
 
 TOTAL OFFENSE
 
 Rank           Team    Gm  Pl  Yds   Avg   TD   YdsGm
  1. Houston            14 115 7887  6.86   77  563.36
  2. UTEP               12 823 5144  6.25   46  428.67
  3. UAB                12 754 5111  6.78   42  425.92
  4. Southern Miss.     13 903 5413  5.99   57  416.38
  5. Tulsa              12 869 4921  5.66   45  410.08
  6. SMU                13 850 5093  5.99   50  391.77
  7. Memphis            12 841 4477  5.32   33  373.08
  8. East Carolina      14 981 5172  5.27   45  369.43
  9. Marshall           13 875 4538  5.19   34  349.08
 10. UCF                13 859 4431  5.16   43  340.85
 11. Tulane             12 768 3750  4.88   24  312.50
 12. Rice               12 859 3655  4.25   28  304.58
 
 TURNOVER MARGIN
 
 Rank           Team    Gm  FGa IGa Gtot FLo ILo Ltot  Mrgn
  1. East Carolina      14   17  17   34  11  12   23   .79
  2. Southern Miss.     13   15  12   27  11   6   17   .77
  3. UAB                12   11  11   22   5   8   13   .75
  4. UCF                13   16  12   28   7  13   20   .62
  5. Houston            14   19  11   30  11  15   26   .29
  6. SMU                13   11  17   28  12  14   26   .15
  7. Tulsa              12   12   9   21  13  10   23  -.17
  8. UTEP               12    7  11   18   8  13   21  -.25
  9. Marshall           13    9   9   18   9  13   22  -.31
 10. Rice               12   12   6   18  10  17   27  -.75
 10. Memphis            12    8   9   17  11  15   26  -.75
 12. Tulane             12    5   5   10  12  14   26 -1.33
 



Fanatics


ADVERTISEMENT


25Home

D1SportsNet





D1SportsNet