D1SportsNet


COLLEGE FOOTBALL STATISTICS


2011
 Conference USA
 
 ALL-PURPOSE RUNNING
 
 Rank           Player                Gm  Net Rec  PR Kor Yards  Yds/gm
  1. Patrick Edwards, Houston         14    6 175 210   0  1968  140.57
  2. Robert Kelley, Tulane            13  332 178   0 130  1815  139.62
  3. Zach Line, SMU                   10 1224 139   0   0  1363  136.30
  4. Tracy Lampley, Southern Miss.    14  463 574 356 405  1798  128.43
  5. Trey Watts, Tulsa                13  881 242  24 482  1629  125.31
  6. Tyron Carrier, Houston           14   15 958   0 756  1729  123.50
  7. Vernon Frazier, UTEP             12  434  56   0 884  1374  114.50
  8. Charles Sims, Houston            13  821 575   0   0  1396  107.38
  9. Tyler Smith, Rice                12  860 309   0   0  1169   97.42
 10. Orleans Darkwa, Tulane           13  924 305   0   0  1229   94.54
 
 FIELD GOALS
 
 Rank           Player                Gm Fga Fgm    Avg FgPgm
  1. Danny Hrapmann, Southern Miss.   14  34  23   .676  1.64
  2. Chris Boswell, Rice              12  21  17   .810  1.42
  3. Ty Long, UAB                     12  19  16   .842  1.33
  4. Dakota Warren, UTEP              11  22  13   .591  1.18
  5. Kevin Fitzpatrick, Tulsa         13  18  15   .833  1.15
  6. Michael Barbour, East Carolina   12  17  12   .706  1.00
  6. Tyler Warner, Marshall           12  15  12   .800  1.00
  8. Matt Hogan, Houston              14  17  13   .765   .93
  9. Cairo Santos, Tulane             13  18  11   .611   .85
 10. Nick Cattoi, UCF                 12  15  10   .667   .83
 
 INTERCEPTIONS
 
 Rank           Player                Gm Int Yds  TD IntPg
  1. Bryce Callahan, Rice             12   6  25   0   .50
  2. Dexter McCoil, Tulsa             13   6 131   1   .46
  3. Phillip Steward, Houston         14   6  61   0   .43
  4. Damon Magazu, East Carolina      12   4  37   0   .33
  4. Rashad Jackson, Marshall         12   4  47   0   .33
  6. Omar Brown, Marshall             13   4  55   1   .31
  6. Milton Howell, Tulsa             13   4  44   0   .31
  6. Ryan Travis, Tulane              13   4  59   1   .31
  9. Deron Wilson, Southern Miss.     14   4 114   2   .29
 10. Akeem Davis, Memphis             12   3  43   0   .25
 
 KICKOFF RETURN
 
 Rank           Player                 Gm KRet  Yds  TD    Avg  RetGm
  1. Rannell Hall, UCF                 12   23  714   0  31.04   1.92
  2. Vernon Frazier, UTEP              12   29  884   0  30.48   2.42
  3. Tyron Carrier, Houston            14   30  756   1  25.20   2.14
  4. Andre Booker, Marshall            13   33  819   0  24.82   2.54
  5. Trey Watts, Tulsa                 13   20  482   1  24.10   1.54
  6. Nick Adams, UAB                   12   20  456   1  22.80   1.67
  7. Demetrius Evans, Marshall         12   18  397   0  22.06   1.50
  8. D.J. Vinson, UAB                  12   22  473   0  21.50   1.83
  9. Tracy Lampley, Southern Miss.     14   19  405   0  21.32   1.36
 10. James Richardson, SMU             10   26  553   0  21.27   2.60
 
 PASSING EFFICIENCY
 
 Rank           Player              Gm Att Cmp  CPct Int  PYds YdsAtt TD Rating
  1. Case Keenum, Houston           14 603 428 70.98   5  5631   9.34 48 174.03
  2. Blake Bortles, UCF             10 110  75 68.18   3   958   8.71  6 153.88
  3. G.J. Kinne, Tulsa              13 390 247 63.33  12  3090   7.92 28 147.43
  4. Jeff Godfrey, UCF              12 232 160 68.97   5  1898   8.18  5 140.49
  5. Austin Davis, Southern Miss.   14 475 286 60.21  11  3496   7.36 30 138.25
  6. Dominique Davis, East Carolina 12 494 334 67.61  19  3225   6.53 25 131.46
  7. Nick Lamaison, UTEP             9 224 130 58.04  10  1718   7.67 12 131.21
  8. J.J. McDermott, SMU            13 455 272 59.78  16  3421   7.52 17 128.23
  9. Rakeem Cato, Marshall          13 304 182 59.87  11  2059   6.77 15 125.81
 10. Jonathan Perry, UAB            12 300 174 58.00   8  2042   6.81 10 120.84
 
 PUNTING
 
 Rank           Player                Gm Punt   Yds    Avg  PuntG
  1. Ian Campbell, UTEP               12   48  2214  46.13   4.00
  2. Kyle Martens, Rice               12   78  3403  43.63   6.50
  3. Tom Hornsey, Memphis             12   95  3993  42.03   7.92
  4. Jonathan Ginsburgh, Tulane       12   59  2458  41.66   4.92
  5. Richie Leone, Houston            14   51  2103  41.24   3.64
  6. Trey Ragland, UAB                12   55  2235  40.64   4.58
  7. Kase Whitehead, Marshall         13   76  3044  40.05   5.85
  8. Matt Stone, SMU                  13   56  2111  37.70   4.31
 
 PUNT RETURN
 
 Rank           Player                Gm Ret Yds  TD    Avg  RetGm
  1. Richard Crawford, SMU            13  16 189   1  11.81   1.23
  2. Tracy Lampley, Southern Miss.    14  31 356   1  11.48   2.21
  3. Andre Booker, Marshall           13  18 195   1  10.83   1.38
  4. Derrick Strozier, Tulane         11  18 187   0  10.39   1.64
  5. Mario Hull, Rice                 12  16 163   0  10.19   1.33
  6. J.J. Worton, UCF                 12  17 150   0   8.82   1.42
 
 RECEPTIONS PER GAME
 
 Rank           Player                Gm Rec  Yds  TD  RecGm YdsCat  Yds/gm
  1. Cole Beasley, SMU                12  86 1040   2   7.17  12.09   86.67
  2. Tyron Carrier, Houston           14  96  958   5   6.86   9.98   68.43
  3. Lance Lewis, East Carolina        9  60  600   8   6.67  10.00   66.67
  4. Patrick Edwards, Houston         14  89 1752  20   6.36  19.69  125.14
  5. Justin Johnson, Houston          14  87 1229  12   6.21  14.13   87.79
  6. Darius Johnson, SMU              13  79 1118   8   6.08  14.15   86.00
  7. Tannar Rehrer, Memphis           12  70  593   4   5.83   8.47   49.42
  8. Justin Hardy, East Carolina      11  64  658   6   5.82  10.28   59.82
  9. Willie Carter, Tulsa             11  61  868   7   5.55  14.23   78.91
 10. Jackie Williams, UAB             11  58  607   0   5.27  10.47   55.18
 
 RECEIVING YARDS PER GAME
 
 Rank           Player                Gm Rec  Yds  TD  RecGm YdsCat  Yds/gm
  1. Patrick Edwards, Houston         14  89 1752  20   6.36  19.69  125.14
  2. Justin Johnson, Houston          14  87 1229  12   6.21  14.13   87.79
  3. Cole Beasley, SMU                12  86 1040   2   7.17  12.09   86.67
  4. Darius Johnson, SMU              13  79 1118   8   6.08  14.15   86.00
  5. Willie Carter, Tulsa             11  61  868   7   5.55  14.23   78.91
  6. Tyron Carrier, Houston           14  96  958   5   6.86   9.98   68.43
  7. Lance Lewis, East Carolina        9  60  600   8   6.67  10.00   66.67
  8. Bryan Burnham, Tulsa             13  54  850   9   4.15  15.74   65.38
  9. Justin Hardy, East Carolina      11  64  658   6   5.82  10.28   59.82
 10. Jackie Williams, UAB             11  58  607   0   5.27  10.47   55.18
 
 TOTAL RECEIVING YARDS
 
 Rank           Player                Gm Rec  Yds  TD  RecGm YdsCat  Yds/gm
  1. Patrick Edwards, Houston         14  89 1752  20   6.36  19.69  125.14
  2. Justin Johnson, Houston          14  87 1229  12   6.21  14.13   87.79
  3. Darius Johnson, SMU              13  79 1118   8   6.08  14.15   86.00
  4. Cole Beasley, SMU                12  86 1040   2   7.17  12.09   86.67
  5. Tyron Carrier, Houston           14  96  958   5   6.86   9.98   68.43
  6. Willie Carter, Tulsa             11  61  868   7   5.55  14.23   78.91
  7. Bryan Burnham, Tulsa             13  54  850   9   4.15  15.74   65.38
  8. Ryan Balentine, Southern Miss.   14  49  742   8   3.50  15.14   53.00
  9. Kelvin Bolden, Southern Miss.    13  58  671   7   4.46  11.57   51.62
 10. Aaron Dobson, Marshall           13  49  668  12   3.77  13.63   51.38
 
 RUSHING
 
 Rank           Player                Gm Rush  Yds  TD   Yds/gm
  1. Zach Line, SMU                   10  208 1224  17   122.40
  2. Tyler Smith, Rice                12  155  860   5    71.67
  3. Orleans Darkwa, Tulane           13  210  924  13    71.08
  4. Joe Banyard, UTEP                12  127  832   6    69.33
  5. Ja'Terian Douglas, Tulsa         13  112  883   4    67.92
  6. Trey Watts, Tulsa                13  157  881   3    67.77
  7. Charles Sims, Houston            13  110  821   9    63.15
  8. Jamal Woodyard, Southern Miss.   13  110  732   3    56.31
  9. Michael Hayes, Houston           13  138  727  11    55.92
 10. Tron Martinez, Marshall          12  160  649   3    54.08
 
 SCORING
 
 Rank           Player                Gm  TD Okm Oka FGM FGA Pts  PtsGm
  1. Zach Line, SMU                   10  17   0   0   0   0 102  10.20
  2. Matt Hogan, Houston              14   0  91  92  13  17 130   9.29
  2. Danny Hrapmann, Southern Miss.   14   0  61  62  23  34 130   9.29
  4. Patrick Edwards, Houston         14  21   0   0   0   0 126   9.00
  5. Kevin Fitzpatrick, Tulsa         13   0  51  53  15  18  96   7.38
  6. Michael Hayes, Houston           13  15   0   0   0   0  90   6.92
  7. Chris Boswell, Rice              12   0  31  32  17  21  82   6.83
  8. Dakota Warren, UTEP              11   0  32  34  13  22  71   6.45
  9. Michael Barbour, East Carolina   12   0  39  40  12  17  75   6.25
 10. Orleans Darkwa, Tulane           13  13   0   0   0   0  78   6.00
 10. Charles Sims, Houston            13  13   0   0   0   0  78   6.00
 10. Leilyon Myers, UTEP              12  12   0   0   0   0  72   6.00
 10. Ty Long, UAB                     12   0  24  25  16  19  72   6.00
 
 TOTAL OFFENSE
 
 Rank           Player               Gm Rush   Net  Pyd  Pl TotYd YdsPl   YdsGm
  1. Case Keenum, Houston            14   57    35 5631 660  5666  8.58  404.71
  2. Dominique Davis, East Carolina  12   93   172 3225 587  3397  5.79  283.08
  3. Austin Davis, Southern Miss.    14  110   352 3496 585  3848  6.58  274.86
  4. G.J. Kinne, Tulsa               13  125   405 3090 515  3495  6.79  268.85
  5. J.J. McDermott, SMU             13   40  -123 3421 495  3298  6.66  253.69
  6. Nick Lamaison, UTEP              9   40    39 1718 264  1757  6.66  195.22
  7. Jonathan Perry, UAB             12   92   294 2042 392  2336  5.96  194.67
  8. Jeff Godfrey, UCF               12  111   405 1898 343  2303  6.71  191.92
  9. Ryan Griffin, Tulane            13   50   -10 2502 458  2492  5.44  191.69
 10. Rakeem Cato, Marshall           13   57    32 2059 361  2091  5.79  160.85
 
 PASS EFFICIENCY DEFENSE
 
 Rank          Team   Gm Att Cmp   PPct Int    Yds  YdAtt  TD  TDPct  Rating
  1. Southern Miss.   14 535 308  57.57  19   3142   5.87  14   2.62  108.47
  2. UCF              12 385 208  54.03   9   2334   6.06  12   3.12  110.53
  3. Houston          14 469 258  55.01  21   2922   6.23  19   4.05  111.75
  4. SMU              13 443 284  64.11   6   2882   6.51  15   3.39  127.21
  5. Tulsa            13 516 307  59.50  18   3722   7.21  25   4.84  129.10
  6. UTEP             12 404 242  59.90  12   3020   7.48  16   3.96  129.82
  7. East Carolina    12 354 214  60.45   7   2426   6.85  17   4.80  129.96
  8. Marshall         13 460 288  62.61  14   3317   7.21  24   5.22  134.30
  9. Tulane           13 422 260  61.61  12   3190   7.56  20   4.74  135.05
 10. Memphis          12 432 279  64.58  12   3593   8.32  27   6.25  149.53
 11. Rice             12 399 246  61.65  13   3344   8.38  32   8.02  152.05
 12. UAB              12 403 286  70.97   9   3387   8.40  26   6.45  158.42
 
 KICKOFF RETURNS
 
 Rank           Team    Gm Ret  Yds  TD    Avg
  1. UCF                12  42 1131   1  26.93
  2. UTEP               12  49 1291   0  26.35
  3. Southern Miss.     14  52 1174   0  22.58
  4. Marshall           13  57 1272   0  22.32
  5. Houston            14  41  906   1  22.10
  6. Tulsa              13  51 1115   1  21.86
  7. Tulane             13  83 1667   0  20.08
  8. UAB                12  73 1460   1  20.00
  9. SMU                13  39  779   0  19.97
 10. Rice               12  49  951   0  19.41
 11. East Carolina      12  58 1114   0  19.21
 12. Memphis            12  67 1207   0  18.01
 
 NET PUNTING
 
 Rank           Team   Punt Avg Ret RYds NetAvg TotYd
  1. UTEP                48  46  22  150  40.50  2214
  2. Rice                80  43  22  137  39.71  3454
  3. Southern Miss.      56  43  16   98  39.02  2443
  4. UAB                 57  41  14   66  37.39  2337
  5. Marshall            76  40  22  177  36.54  3054
  6. Tulsa               59  39  18  154  36.25  2353
  7. Houston             51  41  11  116  36.22  2103
  8. Tulane              74  41  30  388  35.20  3073
  9. Memphis             95  42  48  557  35.12  3993
 10. SMU                 57  37  28  130  34.47  2135
 11. UCF                 42  41  14  204  33.05  1732
 12. East Carolina       51  39  24  439  29.63  2030
 
 PASSING OFFENSE
 
 Rank          Team    Gm Att Cmp Int   PPct  Yds  YdAtt  TD   YdsGm  YdsCmp
  1. Houston           14 682 479   6  70.23 6301   9.24  54  450.07   13.15
  2. East Carolina     12 524 355  20  67.75 3433   6.55  25  286.08    9.67
  3. SMU               13 476 281  19  59.03 3573   7.51  17  274.85   12.72
  4. Southern Miss.    14 489 292  12  59.71 3587   7.34  32  256.21   12.28
  5. Tulsa             13 421 256  17  60.81 3233   7.68  31  248.69   12.63
  6. UCF               12 346 235   8  67.92 2856   8.25  11  238.00   12.15
  7. UAB               12 440 246  15  55.91 2815   6.40  12  234.58   11.44
  8. UTEP              12 399 225  17  56.39 2707   6.78  14  225.58   12.03
  9. Tulane            13 461 248  15  53.80 2782   6.03  13  214.00   11.22
 10. Marshall          13 407 246  15  60.44 2773   6.81  22  213.31   11.27
 11. Rice              12 384 222   7  57.81 2361   6.15  15  196.75   10.64
 12. Memphis           12 408 224   8  54.90 2283   5.60  10  190.25   10.19
 
 PASS DEFENSE
 
 Rank          Team    Gm Att Cmp   PPct  YdsCmp Int   Yds  YdAtt  TD   YdsGm
  1. UCF               12 385 208  54.03   11.22   9  2334   6.06  12  194.50
  2. East Carolina     12 354 214  60.45   11.34   7  2426   6.85  17  202.17
  3. Houston           14 469 258  55.01   11.33  21  2922   6.23  19  208.71
  4. SMU               13 443 284  64.11   10.15   6  2882   6.51  15  221.69
  5. Southern Miss.    14 535 308  57.57   10.20  19  3142   5.87  14  224.43
  6. Tulane            13 422 260  61.61   12.27  12  3190   7.56  20  245.38
  7. UTEP              12 404 242  59.90   12.48  12  3020   7.48  16  251.67
  8. Marshall          13 460 288  62.61   11.52  14  3317   7.21  24  255.15
  9. Rice              12 399 246  61.65   13.59  13  3344   8.38  32  278.67
 10. UAB               12 403 286  70.97   11.84   9  3387   8.40  26  282.25
 11. Tulsa             13 516 307  59.50   12.12  18  3722   7.21  25  286.31
 12. Memphis           12 432 279  64.58   12.88  12  3593   8.32  27  299.42
 
 PASSING EFFICIENCY
 
 Rank          Team    Gm Att Cmp  PPct  Int   Yds  YdAtt  TD  TPct  Rating
  1. Houston           14 682 479 70.23    6  6301   9.24  54  7.92  172.18
  2. UCF               12 346 235 67.92    8  2856   8.25  11  3.18  143.10
  3. Tulsa             13 421 256 60.81   17  3233   7.68  31  7.36  141.53
  4. Southern Miss.    14 489 292 59.71   12  3587   7.34  32  6.54  138.00
  5. East Carolina     12 524 355 67.75   20  3433   6.55  25  4.77  130.84
  6. Marshall          13 407 246 60.44   15  2773   6.81  22  5.41  128.10
  7. SMU               13 476 281 59.03   19  3573   7.51  17  3.57  125.86
  8. Rice              12 384 222 57.81    7  2361   6.15  15  3.91  118.69
  9. UTEP              12 399 225 56.39   17  2707   6.78  14  3.51  116.45
 10. UAB               12 440 246 55.91   15  2815   6.40  12  2.73  111.82
 11. Tulane            13 461 248 53.80   15  2782   6.03  13  2.82  107.29
 12. Memphis           12 408 224 54.90    8  2283   5.60  10  2.45  106.07
 
 PUNT RETURNS
 
 Rank           Team    Gm Ret Yds Tds    Avg
  1. Houston            14  24 317   2  13.21
  2. Southern Miss.     14  35 448   4  12.80
  3. Marshall           13  21 246   1  11.71
  4. East Carolina      12  15 162   0  10.80
  5. SMU                13  21 217   1  10.33
  6. UAB                12  14 143   0  10.21
  7. UTEP               12  22 220   1  10.00
  8. Tulane             13  22 205   0   9.32
  9. Memphis            12  10  93   0   9.30
 10. Rice               12  24 215   0   8.96
 11. UCF                12  24 201   0   8.38
 12. Tulsa              13  14  82   0   5.86
 
 RUSHING OFFENSE
 
 Rank           Team    Gm Rush  Net    Avg Tds   YdsGm
  1. Southern Miss.     14  553 2872   5.19  17  205.14
  2. Tulsa              13  521 2492   4.78  20  191.69
  3. UCF                12  466 2025   4.35  27  168.75
  4. UTEP               12  410 1859   4.53  24  154.92
  5. Rice               12  467 1811   3.88  13  150.92
  6. Houston            14  420 2086   4.97  33  149.00
  7. UAB                12  402 1553   3.86  13  129.42
  8. Tulane             13  429 1642   3.83  17  126.31
  9. Marshall           13  446 1561   3.50   9  120.08
 10. SMU                13  355 1479   4.17  25  113.77
 11. East Carolina      12  397 1309   3.30  15  109.08
 12. Memphis            12  378 1008   2.67  10   84.00
 
 RUSHING DEFENSE
 
 Rank           Team    Gm Rush  Net    Avg  TD   YdsGm
  1. UCF                12  347 1306   3.76   9  108.83
  2. SMU                13  466 1538   3.30  17  118.31
  3. Southern Miss.     14  506 1660   3.28  16  118.57
  4. Tulsa              13  509 1670   3.28  20  128.46
  5. Marshall           13  470 1948   4.14  19  149.85
  6. Tulane             13  467 2144   4.59  37  164.92
  7. Houston            14  576 2402   4.17  18  171.57
  8. East Carolina      12  460 2090   4.54  24  174.17
  9. Rice               12  457 2201   4.82  18  183.42
 10. UTEP               12  434 2278   5.25  24  189.83
 11. Memphis            12  455 2299   5.05  25  191.58
 12. UAB                12  466 2440   5.24  26  203.33
 
 SCORING DEFENSE
 
 Rank           Team    Gm Pts   PtGm  TD Kxp Oxp Dkxp Doxp  FG  Sf
  1. UCF                12 220  18.33  25  21   2    0    0  15   0
  2. Southern Miss.     14 291  20.79  35  32   1    0    0  15   1
  3. Houston            14 314  22.43  40  38   0    0    0  12   0
  4. SMU                13 300  23.08  36  33   0    0    0  17   0
  5. Tulsa              13 355  27.31  46  41   0    0    0  12   1
  6. Marshall           13 372  28.62  47  43   0    0    0  15   1
  7. UTEP               12 364  30.33  47  45   2    0    0  11   0
  8. East Carolina      12 387  32.25  51  48   0    0    0  11   0
  9. Rice               12 400  33.33  53  50   0    0    0  10   1
 10. Memphis            12 421  35.08  55  50   1    0    0  13   0
 11. UAB                12 441  36.75  58  58   0    0    0  11   1
 12. Tulane             13 487  37.46  62  58   0    0    0  19   0
 
 SCORING OFFENSE
 
 Rank           Team    Gm  Yds  TD Pts    Avg  Kxp Oxp Dkxp Doxp  FG  Sf
  1. Houston            14 8387  93 690  49.29   91   1    0    0  13   0
  2. Southern Miss.     14 6459  63 516  36.86   61   1    0    0  25   0
  3. Tulsa              13 5725  55 430  33.08   51   2    0    0  15   0
  4. UCF                12 4881  40 325  27.08   38   0    0    0  15   1
  5. UTEP               12 4566  40 319  26.58   35   0    0    0  14   1
  6. East Carolina      12 4742  40 315  26.25   39   0    0    0  12   0
  7. SMU                13 5052  45 336  25.85   42   0    0    0   8   0
  8. Rice               12 4172  33 280  23.33   31   0    0    0  17   0
  9. Marshall           13 4334  35 284  21.85   33   0    0    0  13   1
 10. Tulane             13 4424  34 274  21.08   33   0    0    0  11   2
 11. UAB                12 4368  28 242  20.17   24   1    0    0  16   0
 12. Memphis            12 3291  25 195  16.25   21   0    0    0   8   0
 
 TOTAL DEFENSE
 
 Rank           Team    Gm    Avg Plays  Yds  TD   YdsGm
  1. UCF                12   4.97   732 3640  25  303.33
  2. SMU                13   4.86   909 4420  36  340.00
  3. Southern Miss.     14   4.61   104 4802  35  343.00
  4. East Carolina      12   5.55   814 4516  51  376.33
  5. Houston            14   5.09   104 5324  40  380.29
  6. Marshall           13   5.66   930 5265  47  405.00
  7. Tulane             13   6.00   889 5334  62  410.31
  8. Tulsa              13   5.26   102 5392  46  414.77
  9. UTEP               12   6.32   838 5298  47  441.50
 10. Rice               12   6.48   856 5545  53  462.08
 11. UAB                12   6.71   869 5827  58  485.58
 12. Memphis            12   6.64   887 5892  55  491.00
 
 TOTAL OFFENSE
 
 Rank           Team    Gm  Pl  Yds    Avg  TD   YdsGm
  1. Houston            14 110 8387   7.61  93  599.07
  2. Southern Miss.     14 104 6459   6.20  63  461.36
  3. Tulsa              13 942 5725   6.08  55  440.38
  4. UCF                12 812 4881   6.01  40  406.75
  5. East Carolina      12 921 4742   5.15  40  395.17
  6. SMU                13 831 5052   6.08  45  388.62
  7. UTEP               12 809 4566   5.64  40  380.50
  8. UAB                12 842 4368   5.19  28  364.00
  9. Rice               12 851 4172   4.90  33  347.67
 10. Tulane             13 890 4424   4.97  34  340.31
 11. Marshall           13 853 4334   5.08  35  333.38
 12. Memphis            12 786 3291   4.19  25  274.25
 
 TURNOVER MARGIN
 
 Rank           Team  Gm  FGa IGa Gtot FLo ILo Ltot  Mrgn
  1. Houston          14   10  21   31   9   6   15  1.14
  2. Memphis          12   18  12   30  10   8   18  1.00
  3. Rice             12   14  13   27  12   7   19   .67
  4. Marshall         13   15  14   29  12  15   27   .15
  5. Southern Miss.   14    9  19   28  18  12   30  -.14
  6. UCF              12    6   9   15  10   8   18  -.25
  7. UAB              12   12   9   21  11  15   26  -.42
  8. Tulsa            13   10  18   28  17  17   34  -.46
  9. Tulane           13    7  12   19  11  15   26  -.54
 10. UTEP             12    7  12   19  10  17   27  -.67
 11. East Carolina    12   14   7   21  15  20   35 -1.17
 12. SMU              13   10   6   16  13  19   32 -1.23
 
 


Champion


ADVERTISEMENT


2024 NCAA New College Basketball Tees at Lids.com

D1SportsNet





D1SportsNet